Abstract 327TiP
Background
Management of platinum resistant ovarian cancer has always been challenging for oncologists. Best option in this setting is single agent chemotherapy with bevacizumab. However, due to various contraindications and financial constraints, many of them do not receive bevacizumab. Due to high expression of folate receptor alpha in high grade epithelial ovarian cancers pemetrexed could be a potential treatment option. To our knowledge there are only 2 phase II trials across the globe showing the effectiveness of pemetrexed in platinum resistant/refractory ovarian cancer and till date there is no prospective data in Indian patients with platinum resistant/refractory ovarian cancer.
Trial design
The study is a single centre, investigator-initiated, single arm phase II clinical trial designed using Simon two stage optimal design. Eligible patients are adults (age ≥18 years), with histologically confirmed high grade epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer, who have relapsed within 6 months of platinum-based chemotherapy, who are bevacizumab ineligible, with ECOG performance status of 0-2, adequate organ function, with either measurable disease with at least one target lesion for response evaluation as per RECIST 1.1 criteria or non-measurable disease with CA-125 level ≥2 times ULN measured at least 2 weeks before enrolment. Estimated sample size is 63. At least 2 out of 22 responses in stage I are expected in order to proceed to stage II and further recruitment of the patients. Baseline contrast enhanced CT scan of chest, abdomen and pelvis along with CA-125 level will be recorded. Eligible patients will receive Pemetrexed at dose of 500 mg/m2 every 21 days. Response assessment will be done after 3 cycles of chemotherapy (RECIST 1.1 will be used for measurable disease and GCIG criteria using CA-125 level will be used for non-measurable disease) and subsequent responses will be assessed every 12-16 weeks. Treatment will continue until progression, intolerable toxicity or death. Primary objective is Objective Response Rate (ORR). Secondary objectives are Progression Free survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS), Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR), Toxicity profile and Quality of Life (QoL).
Clinical trial identification
CTRI/2022/08/044939.
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
341P - NUP214 gene rearrangements in leukemia patients: Case series from a single institution
Presenter: Yu Jeong Choi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
344P - Venetoclax and azacitidine compared with azacitidine monotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Azzahra Noersamsjah
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
345P - Safety and efficacy of platinum substitution in induction chemotherapy for mantle cell lymphoma
Presenter: Omali Pitiyarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
346P - An assessment of marrow-infiltrating T cells in early relapsed hematologic cancer patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Presenter: Ik-Chan Song
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
347P - New targets for adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL): A map for ATLL immunotherapy
Presenter: Zahra Rezaei Borojerdi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
348P - In-depth molecular analysis in the diagnosis of lymphomas with lymphoplasmacytic differentiation may provide a more precise diagnosis and rational treatment allocation
Presenter: Ella Willenbacher
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
349P - Overall survival and progression-free survival comparison of lenalidomide + standard therapy versus standard therapy only in indolent lymphoma: A meta-analysis
Presenter: Kevin Winston
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
350P - Intratumoural CD66b+ to predict treatment response in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL)
Presenter: Mita Adriani
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
351P - Clinical features and treatment outcomes of Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia patients: A single center study
Presenter: Devi Amelia
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
352TiP - Randomized phase III study of daratumumab (D) versus bortezomib plus D as a maintenance therapy after D-MPB for elderly or non-elderly patients refusing transplant with untreated multiple myeloma (JCOG1911, B-DASH study)
Presenter: Tomotaka Suzuki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract