Abstract 437P
Background
Capecitabine is an oral antimetabolite chemotherapy apply for various types of cancers. One of the most common adverse events of capecitabine is hands-foot-syndrome (HFS). The incidence of HFS is generally about 50%-60%, while grade 3 toxicity occurs about 10%-20%. Interrupting capecitabine due to adverse events improve symptoms but may decrease efficacy of treatment. Products with aloe-vera component was introduced in many studies and showed efficacy in improvement of skin problems. Aloe vera gel with urea cream combination may increase efficacy in HFS for prevention and treatment.
Methods
The study was a randomized single-blinded phase II study. The screening and randomization began in December 2021 until January 2023. Patients who diagnosed with cancer that appropriated for receiving capecitabine were randomized 1:1 by using the block of four. The treatment group received both aloe vera gel and 10% urea cream, while controlled group received 10% urea cream. The sample size was calculated using 90% power to show a 20% reduction of the incidence of HFS grade 2-3 with aloe vera gel plus urea cream. The significant p-value was p-value <0.05.
Results
There were 61 patients in this study. Patients in both groups had a good compliance. There were 30 patients in aloe vera plus 10% urea cream group and 31 patients in 10% urea cream group. In aloe vera plus 10% urea cream group, there are 86.7% in grade 0-1 HFS and 13.3% in grade 2-3 HFS, while in 10% urea cream group, there are 64.5% in grade 0-1 HFS and 35.5% in grade 2-3 HFS, p-value was 0.045.There are statistically significant lower grade 2-3 of HFS in aloe vera and 10% urea cream combination arm. Table: 437P
Severity of HFS
HFS grade | Treatment | Controlled | p-value |
Grade 0-1 | 26 (86.7%) | 20 (64.5%) | 0.045* |
Grade 2-3 | 4 (13.3%) | 11 (35.5%) |
Conclusions
Combination aloe vera gel to 10% urea cream decrease the incidence of grade 2-3 HFS in cancer patients being treated with capecitabine. No statistical difference in quality of life according to DLQI between two groups.
Clinical trial identification
TCTR20230411005.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Department of internal medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vajira hospital, Navamindradhiraj University.
Funding
The present study was supported by the Navamindradhiraj University Research Fund. This study was approved by Vajira institutional Review Board (COA 236/2564).
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract