Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display

339P - A comparison of survival of patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation or receiving CAR-T therapy

Date

02 Dec 2023

Session

Poster Display

Presenters

Kenta Hayashino

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_4): S1599-S1606. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1384

Authors

K. Hayashino1, H. Nishimori2, K. Fujiwara2, K. Kondo2, C. Matsubara2, T. Terao2, W. Kitamura2, C. Kamoi2, K. Seike2, H. Fujiwara2, N. Asada2, D. Ennishi2, K. Fujii2, N. Fujii2, K. Matsuoka2, Y. Maeda3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Hematology, Okayama University Hospitalal, 700-8558 - Okayama/JP
  • 2 Hematology, Okayama University Hospital, 700-8558 - Okayama/JP
  • 3 Hematology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine,Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 700-8558 - Okayama/JP

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 339P

Background

The advent of chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy has improved the outcomes of many patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, it remains unknown whether allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) or CAR-T therapy is better for patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) DLBCL. We thus retrospectively analyzed the effects of both therapies on the outcomes of r/r DLBCL patients treated at a single institute.

Methods

The medical records of 47 patients treated with tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) and 25 who underwent allo-SCT between January 1 2000 and May 31 2023 at Okayama University Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and the response rate (complete or partial). Data on both groups were subjected to multivariate analysis. Disease was considered to be chemosensitive if at least a partial response was achieved, and chemorefractory if the disease was stable or progressed after the last course of chemotherapy.

Results

There were no between-group differences in age, sex, disease stage, the International Prognostic Index, the number of prior chemotherapies, or central nervous system or disease status. The 1-year OS and PFS of the tisa-cel group were significantly better than those of the allo-SCT group (62.3% vs. 20%; p = 0.0003, 47.3% vs. 12%, p = 0.01 respectively). No significant between-group differences in the response rate were observed (tisa-cel group 72% vs. allo-SCT group; 60%, p = 0.3). NRM was significantly lower in the tisa-cel group (no deaths vs. 46%, p = 0.00002). In multivariate analysis of all r/r DLBCL patients, tisa-cel was associated with a favorable 1-year OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.32, range 0.17 to 0.61, p = 0.0004) and chemorefractory status was associated with a poor 1-year OS (HR 3.94, range 1.73 to 8.97, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

The OS and NRM of the tisa-cel group were significantly superior to those of the allo-SCT group. Thus, CAR-T therapy may be more effective and less toxic than allo-SCT in patients with r/r DLBCL.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.