Abstract 383P
Background
BRAF mutation is reported in about 1-5% cases of Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although multiple phase II and retrospective studies have shown the effectiveness of single agent BRAF inhibition and combination BRAF/MEK inhibition in pre-treated and untreated patient populations; there is no phase III evidence. In this systematic review, we aimed to summarize the evidence so far in this setting.
Methods
A systematic search was carried out in PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane database for articles published between January 2000 and February 2022. One author screened eligible studies, which met our pre-defined criteria, independently. Studies were assessed for design and quality, and a qualitative data synthesis was done.
Results
The search strategy resulted in 2952 articles. After two rounds of screening, 11 publications were included with total 655 patients. Median objective response rate (ORR) was 49% (range 33-71%). Median disease control rate (DCR) was 92.3% (range 78.9-100%). Median of duration of response was 9.7 months (range 6.4-15.2 months). The median of reported median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.5 months (range 1.2-17.5months). The median of reported median overall survival (OS) was 14 months (range 1.7-25.5 months). The response rates, duration of response and survival were better in studies reporting the outcomes of BRAF plus MEK inhibitors compared to studies with single agent BRAF inhibitors. The outcomes were also better in treatment naive patients compared to previously treated patients. Commonly reported grade ≥3 toxicities were hypertension, pyrexia, hyponatremia, neutropenia, dyspnoea, anaemia, altered liver function, asthenia, cutaneous epidermoid carcinoma.
Conclusions
BRAF inhibitor with or without MEK inhibitor therapy have shown promising clinical outcomes, with a manageable safety profile, in patients with BRAF mutant advanced NSCLC. Outcomes were better with combined treatment and in previously untreated patients. How these outcomes fare with emerging evidences and promising outcomes of Immunotherapy or chemotherapy-Immunotherapy combination; need further research in form of phase III trial.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
318P - EMPOWER-Lung 3: Cemiplimab in combination with platinum doublet chemotherapy for first-line (1L) treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Miranda Gogishvili
Session: Poster viewing 05.
323P - Development of a model to predict PD-L1 expression in pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma based on CT imaging features
Presenter: Yun Kyoung Shin
Session: Poster viewing 05.
324P - Efficacy and safety analysis of anlotinib combined with immunotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Qin Shi
Session: Poster viewing 05.
326P - Durvalumab (D) ± tremelimumab (T) + chemotherapy (CT) in 1L metastatic (m) NSCLC: Overall survival (OS) update from POSEIDON after median follow-up (mFU) of approximately 4 years (y)
Presenter: Byoung Chul Cho
Session: Poster viewing 05.
328P - Long-term follow-up of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in Chinese patients with metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from KEYNOTE-407
Presenter: Ying Cheng
Session: Poster viewing 05.
329P - ORCHARD: Osimertinib + necitumumab in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC whose disease progressed on first-line (1L) osimertinib
Presenter: Jonathan Riess
Session: Poster viewing 05.
332P - A phase II, open-label, single-center study of QL1706 plus platinum doublet chemotherapy with bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC: Data from EGFR mutant cohort
Presenter: Wen Feng Fang
Session: Poster viewing 05.