Abstract 168P
Background
Although many treatment options have been adopted in patients with metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), such as early docetaxel and AR-targeting therapy, there are currently no optimal biomarkers to guide treatment in these patients. Here, we sought to define transcriptomic landscape in mHSPC patients treated by either early docetaxel or abiraterone acetate by performing RNA sequencing.
Methods
Transcriptomic profiling of 52 mHSPC was performed by whole transcriptomic sequencing (WTS). For molecular classification, NMF (Non-negative Matrix Factorization) algorithm was used. For perform Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), the Hallmark gene sets from the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) were used. Gene sets in this study such as oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes (TSGs), chromosomal instability (CIN25, CIN70), human embryonic stem cell (hES) were used. Single sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA) was computed using the “GSVA” package. Gene ontology (GO) analysis was performed David website. Data processing and analysis were performed using R/Bioconductor libraries.
Results
We classified 52 mHSPC patients into two molecular subtypes by using NMF algorithm, particularly subtype1 (S1) and subtype2 (S2), respectively. Of note, S2 had significantly shorter survivals (r-PFS, PSA-PFS, FFS, and Time to CRPC) compared to S1. Additionally, S2 was primarily characterized as highly mitotic cell cycle and cytokinesis. S1 was characterized by metabolic process. Next, ssGSEA and GSEA using Hallmark gene sets showed that G2M checkpoint, E2F targets, and MYC targets were significantly enriched in the S2. Besides, gene sets including oncogenes, TSGs, CIN25/70, hES associated with an aggressive phenotype were activated S2. Up-regulated genes in S2 was associated with poor prognosis using independent two data sets, and was activated primary prostate tissues and metastatic prostate tissues.
Conclusions
In sum, this study demonstrated the utility of molecular subtyping based on transcriptomic analysis to guide prognostication and potential selection of patients in mHSPC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
247TiP - Addition of induction, concurrent and maintenance durvalumab to induction and concurrent chemoradiation vs induction and concurrent chemoradiation for previously untreated locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A phase II randomised-controlled trial
Presenter: Victor Lee
Session: Poster viewing 03
248P - The use of complementary medicine in Chinese pediatric patients receiving palliative care: A multi-centre study
Presenter: Chun SIng Lam
Session: Poster viewing 03
249P - Improving quality of life and symptom burden with opioids and adjuncts in lung cancer (IQSOL study)
Presenter: Naren Gokulanathan
Session: Poster viewing 03
250P - An analysis of nutritional and psychological status of patients with advanced cancer
Presenter: Shasha Wang
Session: Poster viewing 03
251P - Is QUAD SHOT palliative cyclical hypo-fractionated radiotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer the way to go? An alternative regimen in low resource countries
Presenter: Ravi Kanodia
Session: Poster viewing 03
252P - Preferred place of death among terminally ill cancer patients: A single centre observational study from India
Presenter: Suhana Sulfiker
Session: Poster viewing 03
253P - Hemostatic radiotherapy for gastric cancer: MRI as an alternative to endoscopy for post-treatment evaluation
Presenter: Osamu Tanaka
Session: Poster viewing 03
254P - Sexual function of cervical cancer survivors: A single center prospective study
Presenter: Dinesh Ravikumar
Session: Poster viewing 03
255P - Volunteers’ role to provide quality palliative care for terminal cancer
Presenter: SAPTAPARNA JANA
Session: Poster viewing 03