Abstract 460P
Background
A fluorescence-based cell-free DNA (CFD) assay is a simple method for measuring nucleic acids without prior DNA extraction and amplification. Despite numerous studies on CFD, there were few studies that compare the amount of CFD using fluorescence assay between cancer patients and healthy subjects. We investigated whether the amount of CFD is different between cancer patients and participants without any evidence of malignancy.
Methods
We collected blood samples from patients who were diagnosed as any kind of cancer with distant metastasis (patients’ group), and from participants who have completed cancer treatment and were confirmed to have no malignancy at least for 1 year (NED group). Plasma CFD level were analyzed using PicoGreenTM reagent in each group.
Results
Totally 134 participants [patients’ group (n=72), NED group (n=52)] were enrolled. Median age was 69 (27–83) in patient’s group and 65 (34–81) in NED group. In patients’ group, most common primary origin was biliary tract (18, 25.0%), urothelial origin (15, 20.8%), pancreas (13, 18.1%), stomach (5, 6.9%), and prostate (5, 6.9%). Median CFD in the patients’ group (9.80 ± 2.20 μg/mL) were significantly higher than that of NED group (8.40 ± 0.86, p<0.001). In patients with high tumor burden indicating 3 or more of metastatic organs, CFD was significantly higher (10.70 ± 3.26) than that in patients with low tumor burden (9.45 ± 1.47, p=0.008). There was no significant correlation between CFD and tumor markers including carcinoembryonic antigen (p=0.468) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (p=0.134). Other factors including body weight, body surface area, and age were not related with CFD (p>0.05).
Conclusions
In our study CFD was higher in cancer patients compared with NED, especially with higher tumor burden. Additionally, CFD was not correlated with other tumor markers. A fluorescence-based CFD assay needs further investigation as a versatile tool of cancer treatment including early detection, monitoring for treatment responses, and predicting prognosis based on our results.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
462P - Limited duration of treatment with checkpoint inhibitors in complete responders, yet prolonged survival: A real-world study from India
Presenter: Nitin Murthy
Session: Poster viewing 06
463P - Cost effectiveness of palbociclib and ribociclib in metastatic breast cancer in India using ICER and QALY
Presenter: Krishnamani Kalpathi
Session: Poster viewing 06
464TiP - Phase III study of adjuvant encorafenib plus binimetinib vs placebo in fully resected stage IIB/C BRAFV600-mutated melanoma: COLUMBUS-AD study design
Presenter: Alexander van Akkooi
Session: Poster viewing 06
465TiP - Evaluation of quality of life and functional outcomes following limb salvage surgery in extremities sarcomas
Presenter: naveen kushwaha
Session: Poster viewing 06
YO2 - A case of locally advanced breast cancer with biomarker conversion successfully treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy-immunotherapy combination
Presenter: Long Nguyen
Session: Poster viewing 06
YO3 - Metastatic Breast cancer to esophagus: A case report and review of literature
Presenter: Bhuvana J
Session: Poster viewing 06
YO4 - Succinate Dehydrogenase deficient GISTs is a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma? : A case report.
Presenter: Nurazzahra Kamarudin
Session: Poster viewing 06
YO5 - Complete Radiologic and Pathologic Response in a Metastatic Gallbladder Adenocarcinoma Patient treated with Checkpoint Inhibitor/Chemotherapy Combination: A Case Report
Presenter: Tisha Gay Tancongco
Session: Poster viewing 06
YO7 - Orbital Metastasis in Prostrate Cancer: A Case Report
Presenter: Shabnam Rehman
Session: Poster viewing 06
YO10 - BRCA2 Mutated Recurrent Adult Granulosa Cell Tumor Treated with PARP Inhibitor
Presenter: Debapriya Mondal
Session: Poster viewing 06