Abstract 460P
Background
A fluorescence-based cell-free DNA (CFD) assay is a simple method for measuring nucleic acids without prior DNA extraction and amplification. Despite numerous studies on CFD, there were few studies that compare the amount of CFD using fluorescence assay between cancer patients and healthy subjects. We investigated whether the amount of CFD is different between cancer patients and participants without any evidence of malignancy.
Methods
We collected blood samples from patients who were diagnosed as any kind of cancer with distant metastasis (patients’ group), and from participants who have completed cancer treatment and were confirmed to have no malignancy at least for 1 year (NED group). Plasma CFD level were analyzed using PicoGreenTM reagent in each group.
Results
Totally 134 participants [patients’ group (n=72), NED group (n=52)] were enrolled. Median age was 69 (27–83) in patient’s group and 65 (34–81) in NED group. In patients’ group, most common primary origin was biliary tract (18, 25.0%), urothelial origin (15, 20.8%), pancreas (13, 18.1%), stomach (5, 6.9%), and prostate (5, 6.9%). Median CFD in the patients’ group (9.80 ± 2.20 μg/mL) were significantly higher than that of NED group (8.40 ± 0.86, p<0.001). In patients with high tumor burden indicating 3 or more of metastatic organs, CFD was significantly higher (10.70 ± 3.26) than that in patients with low tumor burden (9.45 ± 1.47, p=0.008). There was no significant correlation between CFD and tumor markers including carcinoembryonic antigen (p=0.468) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (p=0.134). Other factors including body weight, body surface area, and age were not related with CFD (p>0.05).
Conclusions
In our study CFD was higher in cancer patients compared with NED, especially with higher tumor burden. Additionally, CFD was not correlated with other tumor markers. A fluorescence-based CFD assay needs further investigation as a versatile tool of cancer treatment including early detection, monitoring for treatment responses, and predicting prognosis based on our results.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
429P - Cancer and COVID-19 in India: Assessing the impact in a nationwide survey
Presenter: Bharti Devnani
Session: Poster viewing 06
430P - Single-cell spatial architecture of tumour microenvironment in patients with in-transit melanoma (ITM)
Presenter: Camelia Quek
Session: Poster viewing 06
431P - Alveolar soft part sarcomas: A tertiary care Indian centre experience
Presenter: Jyoti Bajpai
Session: Poster viewing 06
432P - Representation of countries and gender in abstracts at the 2022 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Scientific Meeting (ASCO ASM)
Presenter: Laure-Anne Teuwen
Session: Poster viewing 06
433P - Variations in radiation oncology treatment access in Asia and its implications on cancer care
Presenter: Abhishek Krishna
Session: Poster viewing 06
434P - Outcome of high grade glioma patients: A single institution experience
Presenter: Adeeba Zaki
Session: Poster viewing 06
435P - The pattern of presentation of cancer in young adults from a tertiary care centre: A cause for concern
Presenter: Deepa Joseph
Session: Poster viewing 06
436P - Oncologic outcomes in patients with extraskeletal Ewing’s sarcoma (EES): A tertiary care centre experience
Presenter: Ashish Gulia
Session: Poster viewing 06
437P - The prevalence of burnout among medical oncology fellows-in-training in the Philippines: A cross-sectional study
Presenter: Daphne Lee
Session: Poster viewing 06
438P - Estimating scenarios for survival time in patients with metastatic melanoma receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy
Presenter: Megan Smith-Uffen
Session: Poster viewing 06