Abstract 170P
Background
1.4 million new prostate cancer cases were detected in 2020. Survival has improved in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) because of the development of effective drugs such as abiraterone acetate, but universal accessibility to treatment is not always possible because of cost constraints in lower- and middle-income countries. Abiraterone in fasting state is the standard of care in mCRPC. Despite a large food effect, it was administered under fasting conditions in its pivotal trials. Recently, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has included low-dose abiraterone (250 mg/day) with food as an alternative treatment option to full-dose abiraterone (1,000 mg/day) fasting. This translates to 75% cost reduction.
Methods
In this cohort study mCRPC Patients with progression were offered low dose abiraterone with low fat meal along with prednisone 5 mg twice daily. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was assessed monthly and toxicity assessment was made every week. Final PSA response (≥ 50% reduction) and toxicity assessment were done at 12 weeks. In case of grade IV toxicity (Anemia, Hypertension, Hypokalemia, hypocalcemia – CTC AE V5.0) because of higher drug bioavailability, patient would be offered full dose abiraterone. 20 patients were offered low dose abiraterone in 2020.
Results
12 out of 20 (60%) patients achieved desired PSA response at 12 weeks which is a bit on higher side compared to standard dose abiraterone (recent literature). Fortunately, none of the patient developed grade IV toxicity. This finding was assuring, and no patient shifted to standard dosing.
Conclusions
Low dose abiraterone (with low-fat breakfast) is noninferior to full dose abiraterone with respect to PSA metrics. Toxicity is the major thing to look at and given the pharmacoeconomic implications it’s imperative to adopt this strategy in places where affordability is the issue. Let the patients have something rather than nothing!
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
150P - Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer in Asia-Pacific
Presenter: Ravindran Kanesvaran
Session: Poster viewing 03
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
151P - Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Real-world analysis of chemotherapy use and impact on patient outcomes
Presenter: Alison Hiong
Session: Poster viewing 03
152P - An epidemiologic study on PD-L1 expression with clinical observation of initial treatment pattern in the Chinese muscle invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma patients
Presenter: Liqun Zhou
Session: Poster viewing 03
153P - Efficacy and toxicity of HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in the treatment of metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC): A systematic review
Presenter: Tiago Padua
Session: Poster viewing 03
154P - Can urine cytology predict variants of bladder cancer?
Presenter: Hikaru Mikami
Session: Poster viewing 03
155P - Search for circulating tumor cells in patients with urothelial cancer
Presenter: Irina Kruglova
Session: Poster viewing 03
156P - The association between response to enfortumab vedotin therapy and primary tumor location in Japanese urothelial carcinoma patients
Presenter: Nozomi Hayakawa
Session: Poster viewing 03
163P - Outcomes and toxicity of fosfesterol in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Experience from a low middle income country
Presenter: Manuprasad Avaronnan
Session: Poster viewing 03
164P - F-18 PSMA-PET/CT-guided percutaneous prostate biopsy
Presenter: Rajender Kumar
Session: Poster viewing 03
165P - Real-world utilisation of upfront chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Richard Kelly
Session: Poster viewing 03