Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster viewing 03

191P - Phase II study of sodium valproate in combination with oral etoposide in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

Date

03 Dec 2022

Session

Poster viewing 03

Topics

Tumour Site

Ovarian Cancer

Presenters

N Thejeswar

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_9): S1503-S1514. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1126

Authors

N. Thejeswar1, L. Goenka2, B. Dubashi3, S. Kayal4, M. Jayanthi5, D. Barathi6, P. Ganesan4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, JIPMER - Jawaharlal Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and research, 600506 - Puducherry/IN
  • 2 Medical Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, 605006 - Puduchery/IN
  • 3 Medical Oncology Dept., JIPMER - Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, 605006 - Puducherry/IN
  • 4 Medical Oncology, JIPMER - Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, 605006 - Puducherry/IN
  • 5 Clinical Pharmacology, JIPMER - Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, 605006 - Puducherry/IN
  • 6 Radiodiagnosis, JIPMER - Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, 605006 - Puducherry/IN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 191P

Background

Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) is an unmet need. Oral etoposide is an active agent in PROC with response rates of around 20%. Sodium valproic acid (VPA) is a short-chain fatty acid histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor that showed promising results as an anti-tumour agent in preclinical studies in PROC. We repurposed VPA in combination with oral etoposide to evaluate its efficacy.

Methods

In this prospective, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study, we included patients ≥18 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed PROC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) 0-3. Patients received oral etoposide and oral VPA as 21- day cycles. Serum samples were collected from all participants to assess peak VPA drug levels. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity.

Results

27 patients were enrolled in the study, and 18 were included in the final analysis. The median age was 52 (45-59) years. Serous was the most common type 17 (94%). The median number of prior lines of treatment was 2 (1-3). ORR was 0% according to GCIG criteria. The disease was stable in two patients at four months with a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 11%. The median OS and median PFS were seven months and two months, respectively. Grade >3 adverse events were reported in 6 patients (33%).

Conclusions

The addition of valproic acid to oral etoposide in a population of advanced PROC with poor parameters was not beneficial.

Clinical trial identification

CTRI/2020/01/022781.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Student Investigator: DR Nakka Thejeswar; Guide: Dr Prasanth Ganesan; Institute: JIPMER.

Funding

JIPMER- Jawaharlal Institute of Medical Education and Research.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.