Abstract 50P
Background
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the current standards of care for locally advanced rectal cancer. Precise observation of tumor during CCRT with daily MRI can provide real-time treatment sensitivity and tumor biology, enabling patient-driven treatment decision at early phase.
Methods
Patients with cT3-4 and/or cN+ rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing preoperative CCRT with capecitabine on the pelvis up to 50 Gy in 25 fractions from 2018 to 2019 were consecutively included. Rectal tumor volume was measured by single physician (YKK) using daily 0.35T MRI of an MR-guided linear accelerator. Primary endpoint was to assess the pattern of tumor volume regression throughout the full course of CCRT using daily registration MRI. Secondary endpoint was to assess the effect of tumor regression velocity on disease-free survival (DFS). Tumor regression velocity (cc) per fraction of each patient was calculated using the simple regression analysis of tumor volumes from fractions 1 to 25.
Results
Twenty patients were included. Daily tumor volumetry demonstrated linear tumor regression during CCRT. Tumor regression velocity of 20 patients was 2.40 cc per fraction (R2 = 0.93; P < 0.001). Median tumor regression velocity was 1.52 cc per fraction. Rapid regressors had tumor regression velocity > 1.52 cc per fraction (N = 9). Slow regressors had tumor regression velocity < 1.52 cc per fraction (N = 11). Rapid regressors had significantly greater tumor regression velocity (4.58 cc per fraction) than slow regressors (0.78 cc per fraction; P < 0.001). Rapid regressors had numerically superior DFS rate compared to slow regressors. The 2-year DFS was 88.9% for rapid regressors and 72.7% for slow regressors, respectively (P = 0.400).
Conclusions
This study is the first observation of linear tumor regression in daily MRI during preoperative CCRT of locally advanced rectal cancer. Daily tumor regression velocity numerically discriminated DFS. Although this study is hypothesis-generating, the potential of CCRT from therapeutics to a newer level, the theranostics, has been sufficiently suggested. Further validation studies for the value of daily tumor volumetry on treatment decisions are warranted.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
79P - Outcomes by baseline liver function in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with tremelimumab and durvalumab in the phase III HIMALAYA study
Presenter: Arndt Vogel
Session: Poster viewing 02
82P - A randomized controlled, open-label, adaptive phase III clinical trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of EndoTAG-1 plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with measurable locally advanced and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas after FOLFIRINOX
Presenter: Muh-Hwan Su
Session: Poster viewing 02
83P - Impact of viral aetiology in the phase III HIMALAYA study of tremelimumab (T) plus durvalumab (D) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC)
Presenter: Stephen Chan
Session: Poster viewing 02
84P - Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A large real life worldwide population
Presenter: Margherita Rimini
Session: Poster viewing 02
86P - Outcomes by primary tumour location in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer treated with durvalumab or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in the phase III TOPAZ-1 study
Presenter: Aiwu Ruth He
Session: Poster viewing 02
87P - Socio-demographic disparities in esophageal cancer: A SEER analysis
Presenter: Beas Siromoni
Session: Poster viewing 02
88P - Sintilimab plus anlotinib as second-line therapy for metastatic or recurrent gallbladder carcinoma (GBC): A single-arm, phase II study
Presenter: Qingbao Cheng
Session: Poster viewing 02