Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Proffered Paper session: Head and neck cancer

221O - Induction chemotherapy regimen of docetaxel plus cisplatin vs docetaxel, cisplatin plus fluorouracil followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Preliminary results of a phase III multicenter randomized controlled trial

Date

02 Dec 2022

Session

Proffered Paper session: Head and neck cancer

Topics

Therapy

Tumour Site

Head and Neck Cancers

Presenters

SHASHA HE

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_9): S1521-S1529. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1128

Authors

S. HE, Y. Wang, C. Wang, Z. Peng, Y. Chen

Author affiliations

  • Department Of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 510080 - Guangzhou/CN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 221O

Background

Induction chemotherapy regimens of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil (TPF) are currently clinically used for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) but have well-known side effects, such as myelosuppression and diarrhea. A docetaxel plus cisplatin (TP) regimen was developed to decrease the toxic effects induced by fluorouracil. In this trial, we assessed whether the TP induction chemotherapy regimen was noninferior to the TPF regimen.

Methods

We performed an open-label, noninferiority, phase 3, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial at six centers in China. Eligible NPC patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either TP or TPF followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The primary endpoint was failure-free survival. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, safety, and treatment compliance. The trial was stopped early because of strong evidence for noninferiority of TP in failure-free survival.

Results

Between June 2018 and October 2021, we randomly assigned 361 patients to the TP (n = 181) or TPF (n = 180) induction chemotherapy group. The 2-year failure-free survival was 91·3% in the TP group and 82·4% in the TPF group (P = 0·029). Patients in the TPF group had a higher frequency of grade 1 or 2 neutropenia (P = 0·001), grade 1 or 2 diarrhea (P = 0·032), and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (P = 0·014) in the induction chemotherapy period.

Conclusions

The preliminary results revealed that TP induction chemotherapy regimen was found to be clearly non-inferior compared to the TPF regimen in failure-free survival, with a lower frequency of neutropenia, anaemia and diarrhoea. The more convenient and beneficial survival regimen of the TP regimen should be recommended in patients with LA-NPC.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.