Abstract 52P
Background
Irinotecan and S-1 plus bevacizumab (IRIS/Bev) is one of the standards first line (1L) or second line (2L) treatments for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We have previously reported the real-world clinical data of IRIS/Bev in Japanese patients with mCRC (HGCSG1901). Herein we compared the efficacy and safety of IRIS/Bev in 1L or 2L treatment by UGT1A1 status, wild type (WT) versus single heterozygous (SH), among the patients enrolled in the HGCSG1901.
Methods
We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 415 patients who received IRIS/Bev for mCRC at 24 institutions from August 2011 to March 2019. In this analysis, we extracted only UGT1A1 WT and SH patients and compared them. The median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared between WT and SH by Log-rank test and Cox regression analysis. Tumor response was assessed by RECIST ver. 1.1. Adverse events were evaluated according to CTCAE ver. 5.0.
Results
A total of 213 patients were evaluated (130 and 83 patients with UGT1A1 WT and SH, respectively). The median relative dose intensity of irinotecan was 0.77 (range, 0.36-1.12) in WT and 0.78 (range, 0.06-1.06) in SH, respectively (p=0.358). The median PFS in 1L/2L were 14.8/7.1 months in WT and 18.2/7.6 months in SH, respectively (1L: HR 0.696, p=0.295, 2L: HR 0.763, p=0.125). The median OS in 1L/2L were 32.9/15.8 months in WT and 47.8/18.3 months in SH (1L: HR 0.675, p=0.315, 2L: HR 0.830, p=0.298), respectively. There was significant differences in ≥grade3 neutropenia between WT and SH (WT 13.2 vs SH 34.9%, p=0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding diarrhea.
Conclusions
There were no significant differences in the efficacy outcomes of IRIS/Bev between WT and SH. However, ≥grade 3 neutropenia was observed significantly more frequent in SH. It is necessary to pay attention to neutropenia when administering IRIS/Bev to patients with SH.
Clinical trial identification
UMIN000039077 2020/1/8.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Nonprofit organization, Hokkaido Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group.
Funding
Nonprofit organization, Hokkaido Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group.
Disclosure
S. Yuki: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly K.K., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., MSD K.K., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd., Merck Biopharma Co., Ltd., Sanofi K.K., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. Y. Kawamoto: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd., Merck KGaA, Incyte Biosciences Japan, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. K. Sawada: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Ono, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Lilly, Asahi-Kasei, Merck, Takeda, Taiho. M. Nakamura: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Daiichi Sankyo, Chugai, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Takeda, Taiho, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer Yakuhin, Ono, Yakult Honsha. H. Nakatsumi: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Ono Pharmaceutical, Bayer Yakuhin, Lilly Japan, Sanofi, Taiho Pharmaceutical. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
89P - Radiotherapy followed by camrelizumab for unresectable biliary tract cancer: A phase II clinical trial
Presenter: Zhenwei Peng
Session: Poster viewing 02
90P - Feasibility of using tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based testing for patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Georges Azzi
Session: Poster viewing 02
92P - Safety of liver resection following atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with macrovascular invasion: A pre-specified analysis of the TALENTop study
Presenter: Huichuan Sun
Session: Poster viewing 02
93P - Outcomes by disease status in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer treated with durvalumab or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in the phase III TOPAZ-1 study
Presenter: Takuji Okusaka
Session: Poster viewing 02
94P - The treatment burden of neoadjuvant carboplatin/paclitaxel versus 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin in combination with radiotherapy for patients with esophageal cancer
Presenter: Chun-Ling Chi
Session: Poster viewing 02
95P - Additional survival follow-up of TACTICS-L: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization therapy (TACE) in combination strategy with lenvatinib in (LEN) patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan
Presenter: Yoshitaka Inaba
Session: Poster viewing 02
96P - Preoperative chemotherapy flot vs dox in patients of locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma
Presenter: POORNIMA DEVI UTHAYAKUMAR
Session: Poster viewing 02
97P - BEAR study: A single-arm, phase II trial of BI-754091 and afatinib for refractory esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Nai-Jung Chiang
Session: Poster viewing 02