Abstract 403P
Background
Despite increased global effort in promoting gender equity in medicine, progress remains slow, particularly with respect to clinical research and leadership roles. Our study assesses trends in female Principal Investigators (PI) amongst academic Cancer Clinical Trials Groups in Australia.
Methods
The publicly accessible areas of 14 Australian cancer clinical trial group websites were reviewed for trial details, including year of registration, details of PI, and the presence of any gender policies or statements. Data was collected on xxx date. Data was available for: the Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group (AGITG), Thoracic Oncology Group Australia (TOGA), Breast Cancer Trials (BCT), Australia and New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group (ANZGOG), Australia and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP), Melanoma And Skin Cancer Trials (MASC), Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology (COGNO), The Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG), Australia and New Zealand Sarcoma Association (ANZSA), Palliative Care Clinical Studies Collaborative (PaCCSC), Cancer Research in Primary Care (PC4). Three groups did not post PI details: The Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), The Australian and New Zealand Children’s Haematology-Oncology Group (ANZCHOG), The Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG).
Results
Eleven trial groups reported 355 studies, registered between 1994 and 2022. There were 410 trial PIs, of which 152 (37%) were female. There were no female PIs in any group prior to 2003. Despite a rise of female PIs after this time with an average of 0.5 PI per 10-years, women remain under-represented. For trials with a sole PI (n=276), 110 were led by women (39%). For trials with multiple PIs (n=58), 25 included women (43%). Despite having the lowest female PI presence, ANZUP was the only trial group with a gender equity statement.
Conclusions
Despite a slow steady rise of female PI between 1994 and 2022, women have not achieved equity as PI within Australian cancer clinical trials groups. Most groups do not have a publicly available gender policy. Groups without information about PI gender should be encouraged to make this publicly available.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
440P - Targeting KRAS<sup>G12C</sup>: Repurposing of potential therapeutics for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
Presenter: EVA RAHMAN KABIR
Session: Poster viewing 06
441P - Malignant diseases diagnosed in people living with HIV in Japan
Presenter: Kenju Ando
Session: Poster viewing 06
442P - Dose intensity and tolerance of modified FOLFIRINOX in patients with advanced cancer
Presenter: Tejaswini Adadadara
Session: Poster viewing 06
444P - Incidence of cancer diagnosis and cancer care before and after the COVID-19 pandemic in French Polynesia TEAHUPOO study
Presenter: Elodie HIRIGOYEN
Session: Poster viewing 06
445P - Development of a simple and objective prognostication model in patients with advanced solid malignant tumor treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A pan-cancer analysis
Presenter: Yuto Matsushita
Session: Poster viewing 06
446P - Impact of previous immunotherapy on chemotherapy efficacy in metastatic melanoma
Presenter: Meiyu Fang
Session: Poster viewing 06
447P - Clinical characteristics of 21 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus related to immune checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Haruna Kameoka
Session: Poster viewing 06
448P - Prevalence of thyroid dysfunction, diabetes, and impact of palliative chemotherapy in advanced metastatic cancer patients: Prospective data from LMIC
Presenter: Amit Sehrawat
Session: Poster viewing 06
449P - The study of androgen receptor status in triple negative breast cancer patients at Medical Oncology Department, Yangon General Hospital (YGH)
Presenter: Khin Mu
Session: Poster viewing 06
450P - Are grade III well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours a unique clinic-pathological entity?
Presenter: Jahnavi Kalvala
Session: Poster viewing 06