Abstract 122P
Background
The widespread use of oxaliplatin plus infusional 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (FOLFOX) in advanced gastric cancers is mainly based on clinical trials conducted at Western/European countries. The prospective data on efficacy and safety of FOLFOX in advanced gastric cancer is lacking from the developing countries. In this prospective observational study, we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of mFOLFOX-6 in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinomas, as first-line palliative chemotherapy.
Methods
Patients with previously untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of stomach/GEJ, received mFOLFOX-6(2 hours infusion of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) and folinic acid (400mg/m2), followed by fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 IV push, then a 46-hour continuous infusion of 5-FU (2,400 mg/m2). Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks. The patients were prospectively followed up for response rates and toxicity.
Results
Sixty six patients were included in the study with a median age of 57 years. Sixty two patients were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 53%, with a disease control rate (overall response and stable disease) of 81.8%. The median progression-free survival was 6 months (95% CI 5.2-6.7 months) and the median overall survival was 11.5 months (95% CI 9.0-13.9 months). Ascites at presentation, and more than one site of metastasis are associated with significantly lower survival on the log-rank test. Gastrointestinal and hematological toxicities were predominant, with rates of Grade3-4 Nausea/Vomiting (13.6%), anemia (15.1%) and neutropenia (13.6%). Amongst other toxicities, neuro-sensory toxicities were common. Four (6%) patients had grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. In one patient chemotherapy had to be discontinued before response evaluation due to grade 3 cardiotoxicity.
Conclusions
mFOLFOX-6 is an active and well-tolerated chemotherapy regimen in advanced adenocarcinoma of stomach/GEJ. This regimen has similar response rates and treatment outcomes with lesser grade 3 or 4 toxicities than that of triplet regimens compared to historical studies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
79P - Outcomes by baseline liver function in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with tremelimumab and durvalumab in the phase III HIMALAYA study
Presenter: Arndt Vogel
Session: Poster viewing 02
82P - A randomized controlled, open-label, adaptive phase III clinical trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of EndoTAG-1 plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with measurable locally advanced and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas after FOLFIRINOX
Presenter: Muh-Hwan Su
Session: Poster viewing 02
83P - Impact of viral aetiology in the phase III HIMALAYA study of tremelimumab (T) plus durvalumab (D) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC)
Presenter: Stephen Chan
Session: Poster viewing 02
84P - Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A large real life worldwide population
Presenter: Margherita Rimini
Session: Poster viewing 02
86P - Outcomes by primary tumour location in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer treated with durvalumab or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in the phase III TOPAZ-1 study
Presenter: Aiwu Ruth He
Session: Poster viewing 02
87P - Socio-demographic disparities in esophageal cancer: A SEER analysis
Presenter: Beas Siromoni
Session: Poster viewing 02