Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Mini Oral session: Genitourinary tumours

160MO - Concomitant medication (conmed) interactions with novel hormonal agents (NHAs) in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

Date

02 Dec 2022

Session

Mini Oral session: Genitourinary tumours

Topics

Cancer Treatment in Patients with Comorbidities;  Cancer Registries

Tumour Site

Prostate Cancer

Presenters

Ying Zhong

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_9): S1495-S1502. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1125

Authors

Y.Y. Zhong1, A. Anton2, O. Xie3, N. Tan4, S. Maleki4, P. Parente3, L. Spain3, P. Gibbs5, B. Tran6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, 8006 - Melbourne/AU
  • 2 Oncology Department, Walter Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, 3052 - Parkville/AU
  • 3 Medical Oncology Department, Eastern Health, 3128 - Box Hill/AU
  • 4 Pharmacy Department, Eastern Health, 3128 - Box Hill/AU
  • 5 Oncology Department, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, 3052 - Parkville/AU
  • 6 Medical Oncology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 3000 - Melbourne/AU

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 160MO

Background

NHAs abiraterone acetate (AA) and enzalutamide (ENZ) are well tolerated in mCRPC but have potential drug interactions, involving cytochrome (CYP) P450 enzymes. Real-world mCRPC patients are often older with polypharmacy risk. We evaluated the impact of conmeds on NHAs in mCRPC.

Methods

We identified patients receiving NHAs within the electronic CRPC Australian Database. Documented conmeds were collected. Conmed interaction categories C (monitor), D (modify) or X (avoid), defined by UpToDate Lexicomp and Stockley’s databases, were considered clinically significant. Baseline characteristics, drug interactions and patient outcomes were analysed.

Results

235 patients received first or second line NHAs for mCRPC (AA n=116, ENZ n=135), with median age 72 years and median 4 conmeds. 44% of patients on AA and 67% on ENZ had clinically significant conmed interactions. Category D and X interactions occurred in 5% and 3% of patients on AA; 19% and 0% on ENZ respectively. Most frequently prescribed interacting drug classes were statins (n=93) and antiplatelets (n=63) (Table). Common interactions reduced conmed concentrations via ENZ CYP3A4 induction (n=83) or increased conmed concentrations via AA CYP2D6 inhibition (n=24). Patients with significant conmed interactions had lower PSA50 response rates with ENZ (50% vs 74%, p=0.04), shorter median overall survival (ENZ 28 vs 45 months, p=0.04; AA 20 vs 26 months) and time to treatment failure (TTF) (ENZ 12 vs 24 months; AA 9 vs 15 months). Those with interactions had more conmeds (median 6 vs 2), but greater conmeds did not correlate with TTF and led to poorer OS in ENZ only. Table: 160MO

Common interacting drug classes and culprit drugs

Drug Class Patients on drug class, n Interacting Drug AA interaction ENZ interaction
Statin 93 AtorvastatinSimvastatin CC
Antiplatelet 63 Clopidogrel D
Anticoagulant 32 ApixabanRivaroxabanWarfarin DDD
Diuretic 44 SpironolactoneFrusemideHydrochlorothiazideIndapamide XCCC CCC
Beta blocker 44 BisoprololMetoprololNebivololPropranololSotalol CCCD C CD
Calcium channel blocker 38 FelodipineLercanidipineNifedipineDiltiazemVerapamil DCDDD
Anti-arrhythmic 9 AmiodaroneDigoxinFlecainide D C DDC
Hypoglycaemic 30 GliclazideGlimepirideLinagliptin CCD
Opioid 56 BuprenorphineCodeineFentanylOxycodoneTramadol C C CCCCC
Anti epileptic 32 CarbamazepineSodium valproate D DC

Conclusions

In our real-world cohort, potential conmed interactions with NHAs were common, involving routinely prescribed drug classes. Poorer outcomes in patients with significant conmed interactions highlight the importance of conmed review in treatment selection.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Associate Professor Ben Tran, principal investigator.

Funding

Electronic CRPC Australian Database receives financial support from Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Janssen, MSD, Bayer.

Disclosure

A. Anton: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Funding, Consulting, Honoraria: Amgen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Mundipharma; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Eisai, Janssen-Cilag. L. Spain: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Chaired Ad Board: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Invited speaker at COSA (Australian conference): Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advisory Board 03/2022: Ipsen; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares, Stock in Impedimed: Impedimed; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, PROpel study PI for Eastern Health: Astra Zeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, PI for Eastern Health for MDV3800-06: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker, PI for Eastern Health for IPATential150 Study: Roche. P. Gibbs: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Funding, Honoraria: Amgen, Merck, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Bayer, Bristol -Myers Squibb/Sanofi, Pierre Fabre, Roche Molecular Diagnostics; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: MSD Oncology; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Funding, Honoraria, Travel expenses: Servier; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Haystack Oncology. B. Tran: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Funding, Consulting, Honoraria, Travel expenses: Amgen, Astellas Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Funding, Consulting: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Funding, Consulting, Honoraria: Bayer, Janssen-Cilag, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Funding, Consulting, Honoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Genetech; Financial Interests, Personal, Funding, Consulting: Ipsen, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: IQvia, Novartis, Roche Molecular diagnostics; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Honoraria: Sanofi, Tolmar. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.