Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session

294P - Validation of the 8th edition of AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Results from a non-endemic cohort with long-term follow-up

Date

23 Nov 2019

Session

Poster display session

Topics

Tumour Site

Head and Neck Cancers

Presenters

Li-rong Wu

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_9): ix97-ix106. 10.1093/annonc/mdz428

Authors

L. Wu, X. He

Author affiliations

  • Department Of Radiation Oncology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, 210009 - Nanjing/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 294P

Background

This study aimed to validate the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control (AJCC/UICC) TNM staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in a non-endemic region.

Methods

We recruited 614 patients with histology-proven, previously untreated, non-metastatic NPC treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) at our center. Harrell’s concordance index (c-index) and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (TD-ROC) analysis were applied to compare the prognostic discrimination between the 7th and 8th edition staging system.

Results

For T category, the local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) Kaplan-Meier curves of T1, T2 and T3 were well separated in the 8th edition; however, LRFS did not significantly differ between T3 and T4 (P = 0.15). Moreover, the 7th edition achieved higher c-index (0.703 [95% CI, 0.618-0.788] vs. 0.686 [95% CI, 0.604-0.768]) and area under curve ([AUC], 5-year: 0.681 vs. 0.672; 10-year: 0.645 vs. 0.615) than 8th edition for LRFS. With regard to N category, the 8th edition achieved higher c-index (0.800 [95% CI, 0.755-0.847] vs. 0.757 [95% CI,.0.704-0.811]) and AUC (5-year 0.728 vs. 0.685; 10-year: 0.748 vs. 0.680) for distant metastasis-free survival. In terms of overall stage, the 8th edition also had higher c-index (0.800 [95% CI, 0.755-0.845] vs. 0.724 [95% CI, 0.676-0.773]) and AUC (5-year: 0.730 vs. 0.713; 10-year: 0.734 vs. 0.677) compared with 7th edition for overall survival.

Conclusions

The 8th edition of AJCC/UICC TNM staging system achieved significantly better prognostic discrimination than the 7th edition with regard to N category and overall stage but not T category.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research.

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81672989; No. 81872192).

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.