Abstract 246P
Background
To study the main causes of neglect of advanced cervical cancer (CC) in Uzbekistan based on the results of a survey of advanced stage cervical cancer patients. The questionnaire was analyzed in 3 directions: “patient delay”, “doctor delay”, “delay of treatment”.
Methods
200 patients with advanced cervical cancer were included in the analysis, including: IIA-B stage-17%; IIIA-B stage 80%; IVA stage - 3%. Descriptive analyses were provided with the WHO questionnaire, adopted for local use, which should explore the possible barriers of early detection of cervical cancer.
Results
In the questionnaire analysis, the following results were obtained in the direction of “doctor delay”: 1. Which doctor did you talk about the symptoms of the disease? General practioner - 8%, gynecologist - 90%, private doctor - 2%; 2. Prior to the establishment of diagnosis contacted doctor: once - 22%, twice - 29%, 3 times and more - 49%. 3. How many times did you have a doctor before starting chemotherapy: Never - 86%, 3 or more times 14%. 4. Some aspects of the treatment surprised patients, no one warned: yes-56%, no-54%; I can easily ask doctor about the disease: Yes-45%, no-55%. 5. Appeal to the doctors before the establishment of diagnosis: twice - 29%, 3 and more time - 49%; To which specialist did you first tell about the symptoms of the disease: Physician - 97%, nurse - 2%, healer - 1%. 6. How many times have been in doctor with relatives: Never -37%; once - 19%; twice - 24%; 3 and more times - 20%. 7. Where you underwent the necessary examinations: State clinic - 70%; private clinic - 30%.
Conclusions
The main reasons for the neglect of cervical cancer in the direction of “doctor delay” are: Weak awareness of general practitioners; Unsatisfactory in forming patients about the severity of the disease, inability to enter the patient's trust; Absence or low level of psychological support of patients; Problems of timely referral of patients to an oncologist; Problems of deontology in the chain: doctor-diagnosis-patient. Elimination of the above-mentioned main causes will lower the incidence and mortality from cervical cancer and improve treatment outcomes, preventing disability of women.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Nargiza Zakhirova.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
27P - The prognostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and 18F-FDG PET SUV in breast cancer patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Presenter: Soong June Bae
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
28P - Accuracy of core biopsy in predicting pathologic complete response in the breast in patients with complete/near complete clinical and radiological response (Complete Responders in the Breast – CRBr): A feasibility study
Presenter: Nisha Hariharan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
29P - Tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: Routine pathologic markers improve the predictive power of a cell-loss metric based on release of thymidine kinase 1 into blood
Presenter: Bernhard Tribukait
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
30P - Comparison of metabolic changes between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with ER positive, HER2 negative breast cancer
Presenter: Ho-hyun Ryu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
31P - Circulating miR-155 as a potential therapeutic monitoring marker in breast cancer
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
32P - Profile of breast cancer epidemiology in Sanglah General Hospital, Denpasar, Bali from 2012 to 2019
Presenter: Citra Aryanti
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
33P - Contrast enhanced chest CT in patients with breast cancer: Comprehensive imaging analysis and correlation with biological markers
Presenter: Bo Hwa Choi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
34P - Verification of metabolic regulatory mechanisms in androgen receptor-positive triple negative breast cancer
Presenter: Yuka Asano
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
35TiP - Ribociclib plus goserelin with hormonal therapy versus physician choice chemotherapy in pre-/perimenopausal patients with HR+, HER2– inoperable locally advanced breast cancer (ABC): RIGHT choice study
Presenter: Yen-Shen Lu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
36TiP - A prospective study to assess response to neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer at a regional cancer centre in South India
Presenter: Shina Goyal
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract