Abstract 181P
Background
There are no standardised, recognised regimens for third line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer, with most clinicians using best supportive care in this scenario. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX are non-cross resistant regimens. This generates the hypothesis that patients who responded well in the first line setting to gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel could respond again if rechallenged in the third line setting, after second line FOLFIRINOX.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was conducted via an electronic database from two of our institutions, of locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients who were treated with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel both as a first line and third line chemotherapy regimen between January 2013 and July 2019. All patients had an ECOG performance status of 2 or less. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results
We identified 30 patients in our analysis. 63% of the patients were female, with the median age of all patients at diagnosis being 67 (range, 38 – 82). 60% of the studied patients had locally advanced disease at diagnosis. Median OS from diagnosis was 39.0 months (95% CI, 34.0 – 66.0). Median OS from third-line re-initiation of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel was 29.0 months (95% CI, 9.0 – 36.0).
Conclusions
Patient who maintain a good performance status after second line treatment present a management dilemma, as these patients are often reluctant to accept best supportive care when they feel well enough to tolerate another line of chemotherapy. The median OS (29 months) and age (67) is surprising, but probably represents the selection bias of patients who retain sufficient performance status to undergo third line therapy. Patients who have receive first line gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, and second line FOLFIRINOX whilst maintaining good performance status, should be considered for re-treatment with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, as evidenced by our data from two of our institutions. Phase III studies would be highly beneficial to further investigate this as a potential standard of care for third-line treatment in this group.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
St John of God Hospital Subiaco.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
51P - Enhancing the anti-breast tumour activity of STING through a novel sting transcriptional regulator
Presenter: Hanchu Xiong
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
52P - Reverse Warburg effect-related mitochondrial activity and 18F-FDG uptake in invasive ductal carcinoma
Presenter: Byung Wook Choi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
53P - Phase II study of atorvastatin in combination with radiotherapy and temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma (ART): Final analysis report
Presenter: Abdullah Altwairgi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
54P - Association between Parkinson’s disease and brain tumours: A nationwide population-based cohort study
Presenter: Joo-hyun Park
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
55P - Toxicity profiles of treatment with modern fractionated radiotherapy, contemporary stereotactic radiosurgery, or transsphenoidal surgery in non-functioning pituitary macroadenoma
Presenter: Kevin Sheng-Po Yuan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
56P - Hippocampal avoidance in WBRT for metastases: Comparative neurocognitive and dosimetric assessment
Presenter: Vibhay Pareek
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
57P - Multidisciplinary brain metastasis clinic: Is it effective and worthwhile?
Presenter: Annu Rajpurohit
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
58P - Functional status as a determinant prognostic factor for overall survival in adult patients with medulloblastoma treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy
Presenter: Juan Ayala Alvarez
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
59P - Pattern of care in high-grade gliomas after recurrence
Presenter: Nandini Menon
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
60P - Five fractions plus “SRS” boost combined with temozolamide for newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)
Presenter: Azhar Rashid
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract