Abstract 166P
Background
Irinotecan is a key drug for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We previously reported that patients with UGT1A1 single heterozygous (SH) had significantly high frequency of severe hematological adverse events (AEs) compared to patients with UGT1A1 wild type (WT) in irinotecan monotherapy for AGC. However, the difference of initial dose and relative dose intensity (RDI) of irinotecan between UGT1A1 WT and SH might affect those results. Therefore, we compared between UGT1A1 SH and WT regarding the clinical outcomes of the fixed dose irinotecan monotherapy for AGC.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients who received initial fixed dose irinotecan (150mg/m2, bi-weekly) in the multi-institutional retrospective study. 100 eligible patients were registered from 8 centers in Japan.
Results
The number of patients with UGT1A1 WT/SH were 62 and 38, respectively. In WT/SH patients, performance status 0/1/≥2 was 20/40/2 and 11/23/4, treatment line 2nd/3rd or later was 27/35 and 18/20, HER2 positive/negative 17/45 and 8/30, respectively.In WT/SH patients, median PFS was 3.15 and 3.25 months (HR = 1.137, P = 0.543) and median OS was 10.4 and 7.3 months (HR = 0.734, P = 0.184). In WT/SH patients, dose reduction of Irinotecan was required in 30.6% and 50.0% (P = 0.053), delayed treatment due to AE was observed in 44.2% and 39.4% (P = 0.675), median treatment cycle was 6 and 4 (P = 0.278), and RDI was 0.86 vs 0.86(P = 0.864), respectively. Severe hematological AEs (≥G3) were 35.4% and 63.1%(P = 0.008) and severe non-hematological AEs (≥G3) were 6.5% and 15.8% (P = 0.173), respectively. Severe AEs in more than 5% patients were leukopenia (11.3% and 15.8%), neutropenia (14.5% and 31.6%), anemia (21.0% and 23.7%), and anorexia (1.6% and 10.5%).
Conclusions
UGT1A1 SH patients who received initial fixed dose Irinotecan had high frequency of severe hematological AE compared to WT patients. However, there was no significant difference in efficacy of Irinotecan monotherapy in each group.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Yoshito Komatsu.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
9P - XRCC1 Arg194Trp, Palb2 T1100T (3300T>G), HMMR V353A, TNF aG308A polymorphisms as diagnostic and prognostic markers of breast cancer in the Kyrgyz ethnic group
Presenter: Aigul Semetei kyzy
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
232P - Early Results from the Phase I Study of SY-1365, a Potent and Selective CDK7 inhibitor, in Patients with Ovarian Cancer and Advanced Solid Tumors
Presenter: Debra Richardson
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
382P - Drug metabolizing enzymes pharmacogenomic: Biomarkers for improved chemotherapy in head and neck cancer squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Sunishtha Bhatia
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
401P - Women in oncology: Alarming figures from India
Presenter: Sharada Mailankody
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
416P - Multidisciplinary management of sarcomas of the head and neck: An institutional experience
Presenter: Kavitha Jain
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
523P - Co-morbilities and survival of patients initially diagnosed with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: Impact of hypertension, diabetes and chronic hepatitis B viral infection
Presenter: Weigang Xiu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
529P - Osimertinib for patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC and asymptomatic brain metastases: An open-label, two-arm, phase II study
Presenter: Roni Gillis
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract