Abstract 166P
Background
Irinotecan is a key drug for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We previously reported that patients with UGT1A1 single heterozygous (SH) had significantly high frequency of severe hematological adverse events (AEs) compared to patients with UGT1A1 wild type (WT) in irinotecan monotherapy for AGC. However, the difference of initial dose and relative dose intensity (RDI) of irinotecan between UGT1A1 WT and SH might affect those results. Therefore, we compared between UGT1A1 SH and WT regarding the clinical outcomes of the fixed dose irinotecan monotherapy for AGC.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients who received initial fixed dose irinotecan (150mg/m2, bi-weekly) in the multi-institutional retrospective study. 100 eligible patients were registered from 8 centers in Japan.
Results
The number of patients with UGT1A1 WT/SH were 62 and 38, respectively. In WT/SH patients, performance status 0/1/≥2 was 20/40/2 and 11/23/4, treatment line 2nd/3rd or later was 27/35 and 18/20, HER2 positive/negative 17/45 and 8/30, respectively.In WT/SH patients, median PFS was 3.15 and 3.25 months (HR = 1.137, P = 0.543) and median OS was 10.4 and 7.3 months (HR = 0.734, P = 0.184). In WT/SH patients, dose reduction of Irinotecan was required in 30.6% and 50.0% (P = 0.053), delayed treatment due to AE was observed in 44.2% and 39.4% (P = 0.675), median treatment cycle was 6 and 4 (P = 0.278), and RDI was 0.86 vs 0.86(P = 0.864), respectively. Severe hematological AEs (≥G3) were 35.4% and 63.1%(P = 0.008) and severe non-hematological AEs (≥G3) were 6.5% and 15.8% (P = 0.173), respectively. Severe AEs in more than 5% patients were leukopenia (11.3% and 15.8%), neutropenia (14.5% and 31.6%), anemia (21.0% and 23.7%), and anorexia (1.6% and 10.5%).
Conclusions
UGT1A1 SH patients who received initial fixed dose Irinotecan had high frequency of severe hematological AE compared to WT patients. However, there was no significant difference in efficacy of Irinotecan monotherapy in each group.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Yoshito Komatsu.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
381P - XKR8 is a promising potential prognostic marker in glioblastoma multiforme patients
Presenter: Kristina Havrysh
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
383P - Screening of prognostic molecular biomarker for resectable pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Yonggang Peng
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
384P - Prevalence of abnormal microsatellite instability test among ovary and endometrial cancer patients
Presenter: Min Kyu Kim
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
385P - Identifying CASP8 polymorphisms associated with breast cancer risk in an Iranian population
Presenter: Alireza Pasdar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
386P - Unusual folding of NaPi2b transporter extramembrane domain 4 during malignant transformation
Presenter: Leysan Minigulova
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
387P - 5-years conditional disease free survival and overall survival for breast cancer patients in South Korea
Presenter: Jee hyun Ahn
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
388P - To identify circulating tumour cells by machine learning approach
Presenter: Yuebin Liang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
389P - The establishment of patient-derived organoid models and drug response of resectable non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Jing-Hua Chen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
395P - Filipinos and lung cancer: An infodemiological assessment using Google trends from 2009 to 2019
Presenter: Lance Isidore Catedral
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
396P - Determinants of visiting a referral hospital for cervical cancer screening at Uganda Cancer Institute
Presenter: Collins Mpamani
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract