Abstract 333P
Background
FDG-PET/CT and Thallium SPECT (TL) which are radioisotope examination are inspection used as diagnostic imaging in the malignant tumors conventionally, and it is reported when useful for a stage diagnosis of the lung cancer. It was common to use the CT imaging according to the RECIST criteria for the effect judgment of cytotoxic agents and molecular target agents. In determining the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), we often experienced that the assessment on CT imaging and the true effect do not match. Therefore, we planned a prospective study to evaluate whether FDG-PET/CT and TL examination is useful for ICI effect judgment. We examined the correlation between SUV differences on PET examination before treatment and 2 months after treatment initiation and RECIST evaluation.
Methods
A total of 18 advanced NSCLC patients treated at Kansai Medical University Hospital from September 2017 to September 2018 using ICI monotherapy were enrolled in this study. We examined the correlation with a PERCIST response rate and the response rate that went to the CT evaluation using RECIST1.1.
Results
The median age was 74 years. There were 15 men and three women. 15 cases were evaluable both before and two months after treatment initiatoin. There were CR/PR/SD/PD;0/3/7/5 by RECIST evaluation, and the curative effect judgment by FDG-PET were CMR/PMR/SMD/PMD; 1/3/6/5. 1 case was PD in RECIST, but was PMR in FDG-PET.The PR case tended to be higher in Tl accumulation after the treatment than an SD and PD cases.
Conclusions
The effect measurement by FDG-PET showed usefulness with more than that of RECIST evaluation and Tl-SPECT seems to have the potential to be useful in determining the effect of ICIs.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Takayasu Kurata.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
87P - Negative to positive lymph node ratio-prognostic marker of survival in node positive rectal cancer
Presenter: Pavan Jonnada
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
88P - The Sidra LUMC advanced colon cancer NGS cohort
Presenter: Wouter Hendrickx
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
89P - A phase II trial of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with high-risk rectal submucosal invasive cancer after local resection
Presenter: Masaaki Noguchi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
90P - High MICB expression confers prognostic benefit in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Shanchao Yu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
91P - Adjuvant therapy for high-risk stage II or stage III colon adenocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched, nationwide, population-based cohort study
Presenter: Chien-Hsin Chen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
92P - Prospective randomized controlled study comparing primary surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery in gastric carcinoma
Presenter: Vipin Goel
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
93P - Biomarker selection of liver metastatic colorectal patients for anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies: A machine learning analysis
Presenter: Yijiao Chen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
94P - NORTH/HGCSG1003: North Japan multicenter phase II study of oxaliplatin-containing regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer: Final analysis
Presenter: Michio Nakamura
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
95P - Anatomical resections improve relapse-free survival in patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF- mutated colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Ye Wei
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
96P - Incidence, characteristics and prognosis in colorectal cancer with CNS metastases
Presenter: Nicola Taylor
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract