Abstract 445P
Background
Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients treated with curative intended surgery undergo 5-FU continuous infusion based chemotherapy using totally implantable central venous port system (TICVPS) in case of high-risk of recurrence. Approximately 30% patients relapse after the completion of therapy, especially within 2 years. Hence, many of high-risk CRC patients keep the TICVPS during 6-24 months after treatment, with regular intervals of TICVPS flushing. The manufacturer recommends monthly flushing for maintain TICVPS, however the interval of flushing lacks scientific evidence. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the extended maintenance intervals is safe and feasible.
Methods
A retrospective cohort was conducted in CRC patients who underwent curative intended surgery and perioperative chemotherapy using TICVPS between 2010 and 2017. Patient were enrolled if TICVPS was maintained at least 6 months with 3-month interval flushing using heparin, while patient who were recurred within 1 month, removed TICVPS within 6 months without definitive causes, or violation of flushing interval were excluded. The primary end points were the functional TICVPS maintenance rate.
Results
A total of 214 CRC patients underwent curative intended treatments during the study period. Among them, 6 patients (early recurrence within 1 month) and 54 patients (violation of flushing interval) were excluded, finally 154 patients were analyzed. Mean flushing interval was 98.4 days. At the Dec 2018, 35 patients kept the TICVPS, 92 were planned removal, and 25 were reused the TICVPS, while two patients had to unexpectedly remove due to TICVPS site infection and pain. Thus, the functional TICVPS maintenance rate was 98.8%. 38 patients were relapsed and 30 were treated with intravenous chemotherapy. Among them, 25 patients (83.3%) were reused the existing TICVPS without re-insertion procedure.
Conclusions
Our study demonstrated that 3-month interval flushing is safe and feasible in CRC patients. Extended time interval up to 3 months might be considered because it is compatible with CRC surveillance visit schedules and convenient for patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
74TiP - Phase I study of BI 836880, a VEGF/Ang2-blocking nanobody®, as monotherapy and in combination with BI 754091, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in Japanese patients (pts) with advanced solid tumours
Presenter: Kentaro Yamazaki
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
75P - A parallel deep learning network framework for whole-body bone scan image analysis
Presenter: Xiaorong Pu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
76P - Perception and satisfaction of cancer patients in clinical trials
Presenter: Jukyung Jeon
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
77P - A prognostic nomogram for the prediction of neuroblastoma
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
80P - The clinical usefulness of a new fat-dissociation method to detect lymph nodes from surgically resected specimen in colorectal cancer: Prospective randomized study
Presenter: Shiki Fujino
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
81P - Concurrent or consolidation chemotherapy during radiation as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer: A propensity score analysis from two prospective study
Presenter: JianWei Zhang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
82P - Body mass index, tumour location, and colorectal cancer survival
Presenter: Dake Chu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
83P - Helicobacter bilis may play a role in the carcinogenesis of colitis associated colon cancer correlating to increased number of CD4+CD45RB+ T cells
Presenter: Xiangsheng Fu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
84P - Comprehensive evaluation of relapse risk (CERR) score for colorectal liver metastases development and validation
Presenter: Jianmin Xu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
85P - Which is the best partner for capecitabine-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer? A retrospective analysis of a comprehensive cancer center
Presenter: Jingwen Wang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract