Abstract 280P
Background
Multiple studies in the past have elaborated the role of different risks stratification scores such as Sokal, Hasford, and Eutos (S.H.E.). These studies either correlated the risk stratification with survival, PFS, CcyR, MMR, or point BCR-ABL at different time intervals post-TKI. However, as we understand, all patients do not have a similar disease burden at the initiation of TKI. Also, using cut off level for different age group, gender, and disease burdens is an oversimplification of the disease remission criteria. There are very few studies on the rate (velocity) of the fall of BCR-ABL. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of various prognostic score in predicting the fall in BCR ABL over two years.
Methods
This is a prospective observational study comprising 653 (sample size predicted: 300) patients managed at a tertiary care center in north India based on a uniform treatment and evaluation protocol (Generic Imatinib 400 mg OD and three monthly RQ-PCR-BCR/ABL-IS). Statistics were done using Python-13.
Results
The median age of the study population was 43 years (16-87). On comparing the three risk groups of Sokal, the high-risk patients had the least fall in BCR-ABL at any time point up to 2 years post intiation of TKI. Whereas, there was no difference between low and intermediate risk. The difference in the three groups was not statistically significant. There was also no statistically significant difference in the rate of fall of BCR/ABL in the three risk groups of Hasford. The two risk groups of Eutos score had a significant difference in the rate of fall of BCR/ABL, the high risk having a lower rate in comparison to low risk.
Conclusions
Of the three scoring systems, the EUTOS score outperforms as a prognostic model using rate of fall of BCR-ABL in newly diagnosed CML-CP patients upto two years on Generic Imatinib.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
NA.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
87P - Negative to positive lymph node ratio-prognostic marker of survival in node positive rectal cancer
Presenter: Pavan Jonnada
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
88P - The Sidra LUMC advanced colon cancer NGS cohort
Presenter: Wouter Hendrickx
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
89P - A phase II trial of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with high-risk rectal submucosal invasive cancer after local resection
Presenter: Masaaki Noguchi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
90P - High MICB expression confers prognostic benefit in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Shanchao Yu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
91P - Adjuvant therapy for high-risk stage II or stage III colon adenocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched, nationwide, population-based cohort study
Presenter: Chien-Hsin Chen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
92P - Prospective randomized controlled study comparing primary surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery in gastric carcinoma
Presenter: Vipin Goel
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
93P - Biomarker selection of liver metastatic colorectal patients for anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies: A machine learning analysis
Presenter: Yijiao Chen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
94P - NORTH/HGCSG1003: North Japan multicenter phase II study of oxaliplatin-containing regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer: Final analysis
Presenter: Michio Nakamura
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
95P - Anatomical resections improve relapse-free survival in patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF- mutated colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Ye Wei
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
96P - Incidence, characteristics and prognosis in colorectal cancer with CNS metastases
Presenter: Nicola Taylor
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract