Abstract 280P
Background
Multiple studies in the past have elaborated the role of different risks stratification scores such as Sokal, Hasford, and Eutos (S.H.E.). These studies either correlated the risk stratification with survival, PFS, CcyR, MMR, or point BCR-ABL at different time intervals post-TKI. However, as we understand, all patients do not have a similar disease burden at the initiation of TKI. Also, using cut off level for different age group, gender, and disease burdens is an oversimplification of the disease remission criteria. There are very few studies on the rate (velocity) of the fall of BCR-ABL. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of various prognostic score in predicting the fall in BCR ABL over two years.
Methods
This is a prospective observational study comprising 653 (sample size predicted: 300) patients managed at a tertiary care center in north India based on a uniform treatment and evaluation protocol (Generic Imatinib 400 mg OD and three monthly RQ-PCR-BCR/ABL-IS). Statistics were done using Python-13.
Results
The median age of the study population was 43 years (16-87). On comparing the three risk groups of Sokal, the high-risk patients had the least fall in BCR-ABL at any time point up to 2 years post intiation of TKI. Whereas, there was no difference between low and intermediate risk. The difference in the three groups was not statistically significant. There was also no statistically significant difference in the rate of fall of BCR/ABL in the three risk groups of Hasford. The two risk groups of Eutos score had a significant difference in the rate of fall of BCR/ABL, the high risk having a lower rate in comparison to low risk.
Conclusions
Of the three scoring systems, the EUTOS score outperforms as a prognostic model using rate of fall of BCR-ABL in newly diagnosed CML-CP patients upto two years on Generic Imatinib.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
NA.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
174P - Progression of computer aided diagnosis on gastric cancer
Presenter: Yingyan Yu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
175P - Hypermethylation of the PCDHB15 promoter predicts the prognosis in gastric cancer
Presenter: Yu-ting Lee
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
176P - DCLK1 promotes tumour invasion and metastasis through epithelial-mesenchymal transition and the MEK/ERK pathway in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Jiannan Yao
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
177P - Comparison of nab-paclitaxel plus ramcirumab and paclitaxel plus ramcirumab in patients with pretreated metastatic gastric cancer
Presenter: Yosuke Horita
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
178P - Chief cell in stomach have stem cell activity and potential to develop gastric cancer
Presenter: Akihiro Yamamura
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
179P - Postoperative Adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization versus surgery alone for resected hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity-score matching study
Presenter: Mingyu Chen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
180P - LHPP inhibit the cell proliferation and EMT via the TGFβ/SMAD3 signaling pathway in iCCA
Presenter: Dan Wang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
181P - The emerging role of third-line gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Andrew Dean
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
182P - Durable response to second-line m-FOLFIRINOX for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma in patients with performance status of two or less
Presenter: Adarsh Das
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
183P - Epidemiologic profile of gastric cancer in East Azerbaijan, Iran: 2 years population-based cancer registry results
Presenter: Pooneh Jabbaripour
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract