Abstract 46P
Background
Breast cancer is one of the malignant diseases with the highest prevalence around the world, including Indonesia. Data from Global Cancer Statistics 2018 (GLOBOCAN) predicted that up to 2.1 billion women were diagnosed with breast cancer; therefore, it became one of the top four cancerous diseases in women. Several studies have revealed the role of CD36 molecule in breast cancer and there are several gaps in CD36 expression knowledge. In tumor adhesion, CD36 is involved in cellular interaction with collagen in the extracellular matrix. Some measurement methods of CD36 expression molecules include gene expression measurement through micro-assay, total RNA analysis, and plasma examination through ELISA techniques already done in subjects with non alcoholic fatty liver disease, diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance, coronary arterial disease, carotid atherosclerosis, chronic kidney disease, and ischaemic stroke. However, concentration measurement of CD36 plasma molecule in breast cancer using ELISA technique has not yet been done in previous studies.
Methods
This is a cross-sectional study, was held during June 2018 up to February 2019. Sampling methods were taken consecutively in 118 subjects, consisted of 76 BC subjects, 42 normal subjects. Inclusion criteria included women aged 18 to 70 years old, having pathological invasive breast cancers, and subjects were willing to sign the informed consent sheets. Exclusion criteria included subjects with disease progressivity during therapy, diabetes mellitus, stroke, liver, coronary arterial disease, chronic kidney disease. Subjects were then drawn 2 cc of the peripheral blood,and then was centrifuged in 3000 RPM for 15 minutes. After that, the plasma was analyzed with ELISA technique with reagent (Bioassay Technology Laboratory). Data was analyzed using SPSS for windows version 20.
Results
Table: 46P
Profile of plasma CD36 concentration
Characteristic | Median concentration CD36 (ng/mL) | p |
---|---|---|
BC Healthy | 0.21 (-0.05 up to 0.70) 0.57 (0.13 up to 1.05) | 0.00 |
Metastatic BC Non metastatic BC | 0.21 (-0.05 up to 0.70) 0.21 (-0.05 up to 0.70) | > 0.05 |
BC with LN metastatic BC without LN metastatic | 0.20 (-0.05 up to 0.70) 0.23 (-0.05 up to 0.70) | > 0.05 |
Luminal tumor HER2 tumor Triple negative tumor | 0.21 (-0.05 up to 0.67) 0.21 (-0.02 up to 0.70) 0.22 (-0.02 up to 0.36) | > 0.05 |
G1 G2 G3 Unknown grade | 0.23 (0.16 up to 0.70) 0.21 (-0.05 up to 0.70) 0,20 (-0,02 up to 0,67) 0.22 (0.10 up to 0.53) | > 0.05 |
Tumor size > 2 cm Tumor size ≤ 2 cm | 0.21 (-0.05 up to 0.70) 0.26 (0.13 up to 0.70) | > 0.05 |
BC with BMI≥ 23 BC with BMI < 23 | 0.20 (-0.05 up to 0.70) 0.23 (-0.05 up to 0.70) | > 0.05 |
Conclusions
Plasma CD36 concentration of breast cancer is lower than the healthy. There are insignificant differences of plasma CD36 concentration profile breast cancer patients based on metastatic status, lymph node metastatic, molecular subtype, invasive cancer histologic grade, and body mass index.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The Ethics Committee of The Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
75P - A parallel deep learning network framework for whole-body bone scan image analysis
Presenter: Xiaorong Pu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
76P - Perception and satisfaction of cancer patients in clinical trials
Presenter: Jukyung Jeon
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
77P - A prognostic nomogram for the prediction of neuroblastoma
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
80P - The clinical usefulness of a new fat-dissociation method to detect lymph nodes from surgically resected specimen in colorectal cancer: Prospective randomized study
Presenter: Shiki Fujino
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
81P - Concurrent or consolidation chemotherapy during radiation as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer: A propensity score analysis from two prospective study
Presenter: JianWei Zhang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
82P - Body mass index, tumour location, and colorectal cancer survival
Presenter: Dake Chu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
83P - Helicobacter bilis may play a role in the carcinogenesis of colitis associated colon cancer correlating to increased number of CD4+CD45RB+ T cells
Presenter: Xiangsheng Fu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
84P - Comprehensive evaluation of relapse risk (CERR) score for colorectal liver metastases development and validation
Presenter: Jianmin Xu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
85P - Which is the best partner for capecitabine-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer? A retrospective analysis of a comprehensive cancer center
Presenter: Jingwen Wang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
87P - Negative to positive lymph node ratio-prognostic marker of survival in node positive rectal cancer
Presenter: Pavan Jonnada
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract