Abstract 46P
Background
Breast cancer is one of the malignant diseases with the highest prevalence around the world, including Indonesia. Data from Global Cancer Statistics 2018 (GLOBOCAN) predicted that up to 2.1 billion women were diagnosed with breast cancer; therefore, it became one of the top four cancerous diseases in women. Several studies have revealed the role of CD36 molecule in breast cancer and there are several gaps in CD36 expression knowledge. In tumor adhesion, CD36 is involved in cellular interaction with collagen in the extracellular matrix. Some measurement methods of CD36 expression molecules include gene expression measurement through micro-assay, total RNA analysis, and plasma examination through ELISA techniques already done in subjects with non alcoholic fatty liver disease, diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance, coronary arterial disease, carotid atherosclerosis, chronic kidney disease, and ischaemic stroke. However, concentration measurement of CD36 plasma molecule in breast cancer using ELISA technique has not yet been done in previous studies.
Methods
This is a cross-sectional study, was held during June 2018 up to February 2019. Sampling methods were taken consecutively in 118 subjects, consisted of 76 BC subjects, 42 normal subjects. Inclusion criteria included women aged 18 to 70 years old, having pathological invasive breast cancers, and subjects were willing to sign the informed consent sheets. Exclusion criteria included subjects with disease progressivity during therapy, diabetes mellitus, stroke, liver, coronary arterial disease, chronic kidney disease. Subjects were then drawn 2 cc of the peripheral blood,and then was centrifuged in 3000 RPM for 15 minutes. After that, the plasma was analyzed with ELISA technique with reagent (Bioassay Technology Laboratory). Data was analyzed using SPSS for windows version 20.
Results
Table: 46P
Profile of plasma CD36 concentration
Characteristic | Median concentration CD36 (ng/mL) | p |
---|---|---|
BC Healthy | 0.21 (-0.05 up to 0.70) 0.57 (0.13 up to 1.05) | 0.00 |
Metastatic BC Non metastatic BC | 0.21 (-0.05 up to 0.70) 0.21 (-0.05 up to 0.70) | > 0.05 |
BC with LN metastatic BC without LN metastatic | 0.20 (-0.05 up to 0.70) 0.23 (-0.05 up to 0.70) | > 0.05 |
Luminal tumor HER2 tumor Triple negative tumor | 0.21 (-0.05 up to 0.67) 0.21 (-0.02 up to 0.70) 0.22 (-0.02 up to 0.36) | > 0.05 |
G1 G2 G3 Unknown grade | 0.23 (0.16 up to 0.70) 0.21 (-0.05 up to 0.70) 0,20 (-0,02 up to 0,67) 0.22 (0.10 up to 0.53) | > 0.05 |
Tumor size > 2 cm Tumor size ≤ 2 cm | 0.21 (-0.05 up to 0.70) 0.26 (0.13 up to 0.70) | > 0.05 |
BC with BMI≥ 23 BC with BMI < 23 | 0.20 (-0.05 up to 0.70) 0.23 (-0.05 up to 0.70) | > 0.05 |
Conclusions
Plasma CD36 concentration of breast cancer is lower than the healthy. There are insignificant differences of plasma CD36 concentration profile breast cancer patients based on metastatic status, lymph node metastatic, molecular subtype, invasive cancer histologic grade, and body mass index.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The Ethics Committee of The Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
27P - The prognostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and 18F-FDG PET SUV in breast cancer patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Presenter: Soong June Bae
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
28P - Accuracy of core biopsy in predicting pathologic complete response in the breast in patients with complete/near complete clinical and radiological response (Complete Responders in the Breast – CRBr): A feasibility study
Presenter: Nisha Hariharan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
29P - Tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: Routine pathologic markers improve the predictive power of a cell-loss metric based on release of thymidine kinase 1 into blood
Presenter: Bernhard Tribukait
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
30P - Comparison of metabolic changes between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with ER positive, HER2 negative breast cancer
Presenter: Ho-hyun Ryu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
31P - Circulating miR-155 as a potential therapeutic monitoring marker in breast cancer
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
32P - Profile of breast cancer epidemiology in Sanglah General Hospital, Denpasar, Bali from 2012 to 2019
Presenter: Citra Aryanti
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
33P - Contrast enhanced chest CT in patients with breast cancer: Comprehensive imaging analysis and correlation with biological markers
Presenter: Bo Hwa Choi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
34P - Verification of metabolic regulatory mechanisms in androgen receptor-positive triple negative breast cancer
Presenter: Yuka Asano
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
35TiP - Ribociclib plus goserelin with hormonal therapy versus physician choice chemotherapy in pre-/perimenopausal patients with HR+, HER2– inoperable locally advanced breast cancer (ABC): RIGHT choice study
Presenter: Yen-Shen Lu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
36TiP - A prospective study to assess response to neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer at a regional cancer centre in South India
Presenter: Shina Goyal
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract