Abstract 46P
Background
Breast cancer is one of the malignant diseases with the highest prevalence around the world, including Indonesia. Data from Global Cancer Statistics 2018 (GLOBOCAN) predicted that up to 2.1 billion women were diagnosed with breast cancer; therefore, it became one of the top four cancerous diseases in women. Several studies have revealed the role of CD36 molecule in breast cancer and there are several gaps in CD36 expression knowledge. In tumor adhesion, CD36 is involved in cellular interaction with collagen in the extracellular matrix. Some measurement methods of CD36 expression molecules include gene expression measurement through micro-assay, total RNA analysis, and plasma examination through ELISA techniques already done in subjects with non alcoholic fatty liver disease, diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance, coronary arterial disease, carotid atherosclerosis, chronic kidney disease, and ischaemic stroke. However, concentration measurement of CD36 plasma molecule in breast cancer using ELISA technique has not yet been done in previous studies.
Methods
This is a cross-sectional study, was held during June 2018 up to February 2019. Sampling methods were taken consecutively in 118 subjects, consisted of 76 BC subjects, 42 normal subjects. Inclusion criteria included women aged 18 to 70 years old, having pathological invasive breast cancers, and subjects were willing to sign the informed consent sheets. Exclusion criteria included subjects with disease progressivity during therapy, diabetes mellitus, stroke, liver, coronary arterial disease, chronic kidney disease. Subjects were then drawn 2 cc of the peripheral blood,and then was centrifuged in 3000 RPM for 15 minutes. After that, the plasma was analyzed with ELISA technique with reagent (Bioassay Technology Laboratory). Data was analyzed using SPSS for windows version 20.
Results
Table: 46P
Profile of plasma CD36 concentration
Characteristic | Median concentration CD36 (ng/mL) | p |
---|---|---|
BC Healthy | 0.21 (-0.05 up to 0.70) 0.57 (0.13 up to 1.05) | 0.00 |
Metastatic BC Non metastatic BC | 0.21 (-0.05 up to 0.70) 0.21 (-0.05 up to 0.70) | > 0.05 |
BC with LN metastatic BC without LN metastatic | 0.20 (-0.05 up to 0.70) 0.23 (-0.05 up to 0.70) | > 0.05 |
Luminal tumor HER2 tumor Triple negative tumor | 0.21 (-0.05 up to 0.67) 0.21 (-0.02 up to 0.70) 0.22 (-0.02 up to 0.36) | > 0.05 |
G1 G2 G3 Unknown grade | 0.23 (0.16 up to 0.70) 0.21 (-0.05 up to 0.70) 0,20 (-0,02 up to 0,67) 0.22 (0.10 up to 0.53) | > 0.05 |
Tumor size > 2 cm Tumor size ≤ 2 cm | 0.21 (-0.05 up to 0.70) 0.26 (0.13 up to 0.70) | > 0.05 |
BC with BMI≥ 23 BC with BMI < 23 | 0.20 (-0.05 up to 0.70) 0.23 (-0.05 up to 0.70) | > 0.05 |
Conclusions
Plasma CD36 concentration of breast cancer is lower than the healthy. There are insignificant differences of plasma CD36 concentration profile breast cancer patients based on metastatic status, lymph node metastatic, molecular subtype, invasive cancer histologic grade, and body mass index.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The Ethics Committee of The Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
221P - Comparative analysis of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor versus carboplatin-based chemotherapy for cisplatin-ineligible metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter, retrospective real-world evidence
Presenter: Hsiang‐Lan Lai
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
222P - Does tumor grade really improve the prognostic ability of the staging system for men with penile cancer: A SEER database analysis
Presenter: Ravi Kanodia
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
223TiP - EV-301: A phase III trial in progress evaluating enfortumab vedotin versus chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma
Presenter: Daniel Petrylak
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
230P - Olaparib maintenance therapy in patients (pts) with a BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation (BRCAm) and newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (OC): SOLO1 China cohort
Presenter: Lingying Wu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
231P - Cost-effectiveness of olaparib vs routine surveillance in the maintenance setting for patients with BRCA-mutated advanced ovarian cancer after response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in Singapore
Presenter: David SP Tan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
233P - Incorporation of correlative studies in ovarian cancers in the era of precision medicine: Assessment of accountability and utility
Presenter: Nadia Hitchen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
234P - Implementation of mainstream BRCA testing in epithelial ovarian cancer in a tertiary centre
Presenter: Edbert Wong
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
235P - The efficacy of radiation therapy in ovarian carcinoma: A propensity score analysis of a population-based study
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
236P - Front-line maintenance therapy for platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: What’s next PARP inhibitors?
Presenter: Han Gong
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
237P - PARP inhibitor in platinum resistant ovarian cancer: Single center real world experience
Presenter: Saphalta Baghmar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract