Abstract 76P
Background
The study is aimed to identify perception and satisfaction of cancer patients who participate in clinical trials.
Methods
The participants of the study were 110 cancer patients who participated in clinical trials over 2nd cycle at a tertiary hospital, Seoul, South Korea. The instruments used were the perception and satisfaction of cancer patients in clinical trials developed after evaluating content validity index. The collected data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA and Pearson Correlation Coefficients.
Results
The mean perception of clinical trial of patients was 3.97±0.46 out of 5.0. The mean satisfaction of clinical trial of patients was 4.10±0.55 out of 5.0. The perception of cancer patients in clinical trials was significantly difference according to types of cancers (F = 2.88, p=.018), participation period (F = 3.13, p=.029) and subjective understanding of the clinical trial (t = 2.65, p=.015). Satisfaction of cancer patients showed significant difference according to religion (t = 2.32, p=.023), participation period (F = 3.39, p=.021), motive to participate (F = 3.18, p=.010) and decision maker of participation (t = 2.60, p =.025). Perception and satisfaction of cancer patients in clinical trials were positively correlated (r=.66, p<.001).
Conclusions
The results of study can be used as a basis for education program for cancer patients participating in clinical trials.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
27P - The prognostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and 18F-FDG PET SUV in breast cancer patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Presenter: Soong June Bae
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
28P - Accuracy of core biopsy in predicting pathologic complete response in the breast in patients with complete/near complete clinical and radiological response (Complete Responders in the Breast – CRBr): A feasibility study
Presenter: Nisha Hariharan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
29P - Tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: Routine pathologic markers improve the predictive power of a cell-loss metric based on release of thymidine kinase 1 into blood
Presenter: Bernhard Tribukait
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
30P - Comparison of metabolic changes between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with ER positive, HER2 negative breast cancer
Presenter: Ho-hyun Ryu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
31P - Circulating miR-155 as a potential therapeutic monitoring marker in breast cancer
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
32P - Profile of breast cancer epidemiology in Sanglah General Hospital, Denpasar, Bali from 2012 to 2019
Presenter: Citra Aryanti
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
33P - Contrast enhanced chest CT in patients with breast cancer: Comprehensive imaging analysis and correlation with biological markers
Presenter: Bo Hwa Choi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
34P - Verification of metabolic regulatory mechanisms in androgen receptor-positive triple negative breast cancer
Presenter: Yuka Asano
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
35TiP - Ribociclib plus goserelin with hormonal therapy versus physician choice chemotherapy in pre-/perimenopausal patients with HR+, HER2– inoperable locally advanced breast cancer (ABC): RIGHT choice study
Presenter: Yen-Shen Lu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
36TiP - A prospective study to assess response to neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer at a regional cancer centre in South India
Presenter: Shina Goyal
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract