Abstract 59P
Background
Relapse or progression in glioblastoma is common. Multiple options ranging from local treatment like re-surgery, re-radiation to systemic therapies like bevacizumab, CCNU, etc. are available. Patients with longer progression-free interval (> 2 years), smaller volume of disease and disease in non-eloquent areas are preferably selected for local therapies and while the others receive systemic therapy. There is limited data available on the pattern of care in relapsed gliomas hence we conducted an audit to address this deficiency.
Methods
A prospective database of all glioma patients has been maintained from June 2015 onwards at neuro-oncology DMG (Disease Management Group) at the Tata Memorial Hospital. We analysed the data of patients with relapsed gliomas treated from June 2015 to December 2017.
Results
The database had 854 patients of which 749 (87.7%) had disease progression. The treatment received by these 749 patients were best supportive care in 519 (69.3%), local therapy with or without systemic therapy in 85 (11.3%) and systemic therapy in 145 (19.4%) patients. Local therapy consisted of re-surgery (with or without re-radiation) in 63 patients and re-radiation (with or without systemic therapy) in 23 patients. The systemic therapies received were salvage temozolomide in 79 patients, bevacizumab (with or without an additional agent) in 41 patients and CCNU in 25 patients. The factors associated with administration of therapy at relapse were age (p = 0.009) and family income (0.041). The other factors tested were gender (p = 0.311) and performance status at relapse (p = 0.637).
Conclusions
This data highlights that a large number of patients with recurrent gliomas do not receive any treatment (69%), which is similar to the pattern of care reported from Australia. The pessimism associated with treatment of relapsed glioma is due to dismal prognosis at relapse with the current therapy available.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Tata Memorial Hospital.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
381P - XKR8 is a promising potential prognostic marker in glioblastoma multiforme patients
Presenter: Kristina Havrysh
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
383P - Screening of prognostic molecular biomarker for resectable pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Yonggang Peng
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
384P - Prevalence of abnormal microsatellite instability test among ovary and endometrial cancer patients
Presenter: Min Kyu Kim
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
385P - Identifying CASP8 polymorphisms associated with breast cancer risk in an Iranian population
Presenter: Alireza Pasdar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
386P - Unusual folding of NaPi2b transporter extramembrane domain 4 during malignant transformation
Presenter: Leysan Minigulova
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
387P - 5-years conditional disease free survival and overall survival for breast cancer patients in South Korea
Presenter: Jee hyun Ahn
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
388P - To identify circulating tumour cells by machine learning approach
Presenter: Yuebin Liang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
389P - The establishment of patient-derived organoid models and drug response of resectable non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Jing-Hua Chen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
395P - Filipinos and lung cancer: An infodemiological assessment using Google trends from 2009 to 2019
Presenter: Lance Isidore Catedral
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
396P - Determinants of visiting a referral hospital for cervical cancer screening at Uganda Cancer Institute
Presenter: Collins Mpamani
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract