Abstract 250P
Background
Adjuvant treatment for patients (pts) with endometrial cancer (EC) is decided based on risk assessment of recurrence and distant metastasis. Carcinomas of non-endometrioid (NE) histologies are rare, classified as high-risk and adjuvant treatment is recommended.
Methods
Retrospective analysis of EC pts diagnosed and treated in two units during 10 years (2009-2018) with a focus on pts with NEEC. After surgery and multidisciplinary discussion, pts had either no further treatment, radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy (CT) followed by RT or CT. We compared these approaches using survival analysis.
Results
From a total of 330 pts with EC, 66 pts with surgery for NEEC were analyzed. Median age was 68.5 yrs (43-88). Serous histology was found in 34 (51.5%) pts, clear-cell in 13 (19.7%), in 18 (27.3%) carcinosarcoma and one pt had an undifferentiated tumor. Based on the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system, 32 pts (48.5%) were diagnosed at early stage (IA-II) and 34 (51,5%) at advanced stage (IIIA-IV). After surgery, 16 pts (24.4%) had no further treatment, while 11 (16.7%) received CT, 28 (42.4%) CT + RT and 11 (16.7%) only RT. RT included external beam RT and/or brachytherapy. In the survival analysis, the median DFS was significantly higher in the CT + RT group, 31 months (m), compared to both the RT alone group, 14m and the isolated CT group, 11m. For patients without further treatment DFS was 6m, p = 0.03. The median OS showed similar results: pts submitted to CT + RT had favorable survival (78m) compared to the other groups, RT group (64m), CT group (37m) and the group of pts with no further treatment (47m), p = 0.005.
Conclusions
The best survival results are for pts treated with CT+RT. Patients treated with RT had better results when compared with pts treated with CT or with pts without further treatment. These results show us that pts treated with CT are those with higher FIGO stages that were not considered for adjuvant RT. The worse survival results for untreated pts reflects deteriorated PS, extensive comorbidities or early progression. Due to aging and lifestyle risk factors, like obesity, EC remains the most prevalent gynecological carcinoma where better selection and implementation of adjuvant treatment modalities are needed.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Author and co-authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
27P - The prognostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and 18F-FDG PET SUV in breast cancer patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Presenter: Soong June Bae
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
28P - Accuracy of core biopsy in predicting pathologic complete response in the breast in patients with complete/near complete clinical and radiological response (Complete Responders in the Breast – CRBr): A feasibility study
Presenter: Nisha Hariharan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
29P - Tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: Routine pathologic markers improve the predictive power of a cell-loss metric based on release of thymidine kinase 1 into blood
Presenter: Bernhard Tribukait
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
30P - Comparison of metabolic changes between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with ER positive, HER2 negative breast cancer
Presenter: Ho-hyun Ryu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
31P - Circulating miR-155 as a potential therapeutic monitoring marker in breast cancer
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
32P - Profile of breast cancer epidemiology in Sanglah General Hospital, Denpasar, Bali from 2012 to 2019
Presenter: Citra Aryanti
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
33P - Contrast enhanced chest CT in patients with breast cancer: Comprehensive imaging analysis and correlation with biological markers
Presenter: Bo Hwa Choi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
34P - Verification of metabolic regulatory mechanisms in androgen receptor-positive triple negative breast cancer
Presenter: Yuka Asano
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
35TiP - Ribociclib plus goserelin with hormonal therapy versus physician choice chemotherapy in pre-/perimenopausal patients with HR+, HER2– inoperable locally advanced breast cancer (ABC): RIGHT choice study
Presenter: Yen-Shen Lu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
36TiP - A prospective study to assess response to neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer at a regional cancer centre in South India
Presenter: Shina Goyal
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract