Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session

493P - Is exon 19 deletion different from exon 21 mutation in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A single centre experience

Date

23 Nov 2019

Session

Poster display session

Topics

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Sarita Shrivastva

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_9): ix157-ix181. 10.1093/annonc/mdz437

Authors

S. Shrivastva1, B. Stalin2, S. Gundeti1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, 500082 - Hyderabad/IN
  • 2 Medical Oncology Department, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, 500082 - Hyderabad/IN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 493P

Background

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) deletion of exon 19 and exon 21 mutations are the most common mutations in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and predict higher sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). The present study is a retrospective analysis of patients harboring EGFR exon 19 deletions and exon 21 mutations in advanced NSCLC.

Methods

Data of patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations from January 2012 to March 2019 was analysed. EGFR mutation analysis was performed using DNA sequencing by real time polymerase chain reaction method. Exon 19 and exon 21 mutated patients were compared for clinicopathological features and outcomes.

Results

Data of 697 patients with lung cancer was retrieved of which 613 patients had advanced NSCLC. A total of 441 patients were evaluated for EGFR mutations and 135 (30.6%) patients were positive for EGFR mutations. The median age at presentation was 57.5 years(range, 30-88). Smoking history was seen in 38 (28.1%) patients and 97 (71.8%) were non smokers. Of these 135 patients with EGFR positivity, 129(95.6%) had adenocarcinoma histology and 6(4.4%) had adenosquamous histology. Exon 19 and exon 21 mutations accounted for 79(58.5%) and 45(33.33%) cases respectively. Mutations in exon 18, exon 20 and double mutations were seen in 2(1.4%), 3(2.2%) and 6(4.4%) patients respectively. Thirty nine (28.8%) patients received initial chemotherapy followed by switch maintenance. Geftinib (82.2%) was the most common TKI used followed by erlotinib (9.6%), Afatinib (4.5%), Osimeritinib (0.8%) and chemotherapy (2.9%). The clinical profile, treatment details and outcomes are tabulated below. The median PFS and OS were 8.9 months (range, 4-42 months) and 18 months (range,4-46 months) respectively.

Table: 493P

Overall EGFR Positive(n = 135)Exon 19 deletions(n = 79)Exon 21 Mutated (n = 45)P Value
Median Age (years)57.5 (range, 30-88)55 (range, 35-88)61 (range, 30-80)
Sex: Male Female Ratio75 60 1.25:144 35 1.25:125 20 1.25:10.98
Smoker: Yes No38 9726 5311 340.32
Metastases: Bone B/L lung Pleural effusion Brain Liver67 58 40 22 1039 32 22 20 826 22 13 2 10.36 0.38 0.9 0.03 0.24
Rash Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 337 20 10 723 8 10 513 11 0 20.8
Response evaluated Partial response Stable disease Progressive disease111 48 (43.3%) 49 (44.1%) 14 (12.6%)65 27 (41.6%) 31 (47.7%) 7 (10.7%)38 18 (47.4%) 16 (42.1%) 4 (10.5%)0.5 0.6 0.7
Median PFS (months)8.99.28.30.8
Median OS (months)1818.9170.5

Conclusions

In patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutations, tyrosine kinase inhibitors offer superior progression free survival and response rates and are well tolerated. Brain metastases at presentation were significantly higher in exon 19 compared to exon 21. No significant differences were observed in median PFS or median OS in EGFR exon 19 deleted or Exon 21 mutated subgroup.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Department of Medical Oncology, Nizam\'s Institute of Medical Sciences.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.