Abstract 108P
Background
About 70% of patients with colorectal cancer develop liver metastases (LM). Although colorectal cancer patients with resectable LM have a good prognosis, there is little data at the difference in the locations of LM. We investigated how the location of LM affects prognosis of colorectal cancer patients.
Methods
The medical records of 196 colorectal cancer patients with liver metastasis from January 2008 to December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. We defined liver metastasis within a 3-cm-radius sphere centered on the bifurcation of portal vein by computed tomography as central LM (group C), and other LM outside the 3-cm-radius sphere as peripheral LM (group P). We investigated the relation between location of LM and prognosis by using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test, and the relation between location of LM and resection by using the chi-square test.
Results
Patient characteristics were as follows: median age 68.4 (range 30-87), female/male 115/81, colon/rectal cancer 117/79, advanced/recurrent 150/46, respectively. The characteristics of liver metastasis were as follows: mean maximum tumor size 38 mm (3 - 200), tumor number single/multi 58/138, group C/P 84/112, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 31 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 25.5 to 36.5 months] from the date of first diagnosis of LM. We divided 196 patients into two groups ofgroup C (n = 84) and group P (n = 112) by location of LM. Resection rate of LM was 11.9% (group C) and 50.9% (group P). Median OS in group C and group P was 18 months (95% CI, 12.3 to 23.7 months) and 38 months (95% CI, 35.2 to 40.8 months), respectively (p < 0.001). Resection of LM was performed significantly more often in group P than in group C (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the patients with resectable LM had a good prognosis not only in group P (mean OS 135 months, 95% CI, 109.4 to 160.7 months) but also in group C (mean OS 82 months, 95% CI, 67.5 to 96.0 months).
Conclusions
It is suggested that the colorectal cancer patients with peripheral LM might have a better prognosis than the patients with central LM.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
YO31 - Primary pulmonary sarcoma
Presenter: Khilola Ubaydullaeva
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
YO32 - prostatic rhabdomyosarcoma in an adult patient: A case study
Presenter: Muhammad Rafiqul Islam
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
YO33 - Hyponatremia – slaying the dragon or chasing a mirage- a Case report
Presenter: Rahul D. Arora
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
YO34 - A rare endocrinological syndrome presenting with weakness in Soft tissue sarcoma - a Case report
Presenter: Rahul D. Arora
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
YO35 - Gefitinib induced movement disorder - a Case report
Presenter: Rahul D. Arora
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
YO36 - A case of BRAF V600E mutated non-small-cell lung cancer with pleomorphic features
Presenter: Reiko Matsuzawa
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
YO37 - Intraventricular metastasis as the first presentation of non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Siraphong Putraveephong
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
YO38 - Cerebral metastases from a thymic malignancy: a case report
Presenter: Marfu'au Nik Eezamuddeen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
YO39 - Primary Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma Metastatic to the Kidney Mimicking Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report
Presenter: Jestoni Aranilla
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
YO40 - A Rare Case of Primary Malignant Giant Cell Tumor of Tibia
Presenter: Gowthami Venugopal
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract