Abstract 138P
Background
The extent of lymphadenectomy in esophageal carcinoma (EC) has been subject of debate since several decades. Published literature is lacking in concrete evidence of supracarinal pathological lymph node (LN) involvement in middle and lower third EC, and its impact on oncologic outcomes. We present short-term institutional data for the rate of pathological supracarinal LN positivity in operated cases of EC.
Methods
A prospective study was conducted with ethics approval from April 2017 to August 2018. Patients of mid or lower third EC who were candidates for surgery were included. A supracarinal dissection was carried out separately in all the patients in addition to the standard two-field lymphadanectomy. Harvested nodal stations were labeled individually according to the Japanese Esophageal Classification and sent for histopathological examination. Outcomes were recorded in the postoperative period as well as during follow-up.
Results
Of the 76 patients that underwent an esophagectomy, 73 were squamous cell carcinomas whereas only 3 were adenocarcinomas. 44 (57.9%) of patients were stage II, 22 (28.9%) were stage III, and 7 (9.2%) were stage IB. 44 (57.9%) patients had prior chemoradiation, 9 (11.8%) had neoadjuvant chemotherapy whereas 18 (23.6%) did not receive any therapy prior to surgery. 26 (34.2%) cases were found to have pathological mediastinal nodes, of which supracarinal pathological nodes were found in 20 (26.3%) patients. Pathological supracarinal nodes were found in 16/51 (31.37%) patients with tumors of the middle one-third, and in 4/25 (16%) patients with lower one-third tumors. Average supracarinal LN yield was 10.33 (range- 2-32) nodes. 5 (6.5%) patients had only supracarinal LN positive for malignancy. 5 (6.57%) patients had pulmonary complications, 4 (4.52%) had RLN injury/ permanent hoarseness, and 6 (7.8%) had an anastomotic leak. In-hospital mortality was 4(5.2%).
Conclusions
Extended two field with supracarinal lymphadenectomy is strongly recommended in cases of middle third EC, who have received neoadjuvant treatment, although it should be considered even for lower third or gastroesophageal junction tumors.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
74TiP - Phase I study of BI 836880, a VEGF/Ang2-blocking nanobody®, as monotherapy and in combination with BI 754091, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in Japanese patients (pts) with advanced solid tumours
Presenter: Kentaro Yamazaki
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
75P - A parallel deep learning network framework for whole-body bone scan image analysis
Presenter: Xiaorong Pu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
76P - Perception and satisfaction of cancer patients in clinical trials
Presenter: Jukyung Jeon
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
77P - A prognostic nomogram for the prediction of neuroblastoma
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
80P - The clinical usefulness of a new fat-dissociation method to detect lymph nodes from surgically resected specimen in colorectal cancer: Prospective randomized study
Presenter: Shiki Fujino
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
81P - Concurrent or consolidation chemotherapy during radiation as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer: A propensity score analysis from two prospective study
Presenter: JianWei Zhang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
82P - Body mass index, tumour location, and colorectal cancer survival
Presenter: Dake Chu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
83P - Helicobacter bilis may play a role in the carcinogenesis of colitis associated colon cancer correlating to increased number of CD4+CD45RB+ T cells
Presenter: Xiangsheng Fu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
84P - Comprehensive evaluation of relapse risk (CERR) score for colorectal liver metastases development and validation
Presenter: Jianmin Xu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
85P - Which is the best partner for capecitabine-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer? A retrospective analysis of a comprehensive cancer center
Presenter: Jingwen Wang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract