Abstract 212P
Background
The standard practice for management of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) patients in India has been sunitinib or pazopanib in the first line setting, and everolimus at progression. Nivolumab in the second line setting, showed a median overall survival (OS) of 26 months, 2year OS rate of 52% and objective response rate(ORR) of 26%; which was better than everolimus in the Checkmate 025 study. There is sparse data about nivolumab in Indian RCC patients.
Methods
This is a single centre, retrospective analysis, which included mRCC patients who received nivolumab between April 2016 to April 2019. The endpoints were ORR, OS and adverse events (AEs).
Results
31 patients of mRCC received nivolumab at 3 mg/kg or flat dose of 240mg. Median age was 60 years (22-82 years). There were 27 males and 4 females. 4 patients received first line nivolumab, and 27 patients as second line. 16 patients had earlier received sunitinib, 10 pazopanib, and 1 sorafinib. 3 patients (9.7%) achieved complete response(CR), 8(25.8%) achieved partial response, 8(25.8%)had stable disease and 12(38.7%)had progressive disease. The 3 patients with CR, received 18 doses, after which their treatment was stopped; and they continue to be in CR at followup of 36, 32 and 26 months respectively. 10 patients have completed more than 12 cycles. OS at 1 year is 60% and median OS has not been reached. The common AEs were fatigue in 8(25.8%), hypothyroidism in 6(19.3%), skin rash in 4(12.9%) and pneumonitis in 3(9.7%) patients. Colitis, arthritis, immune retinopathy, and myocarditis was each seen in 1 patient. Treatment was discontinued in 3 patients who developed grade 3 AEs.
Conclusions
With an ORR of 35.5%, nivolumab has replaced everolimus, and has become our standard second line regimen in mRCC. Achieving an OS at 1 year of 60% is the best we have seen in the second line setting. The most exciting impact has been the durable long lasting response seen (duration ranging 2-3 years) even after discontinuing treatment, in our 3 CR patients. This has prompted us to make 1 year of treatment as a standard duration of nivolumab for responding patients at our center; enabling us to reduce cost of treatment. It is very well tolerated; but a careful watch should be kept for immune related AEs.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Amit Rauthan.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
A. Rauthan: Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Eli Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
340TiP - A multicenter, randomized, controlled, phase II trial exploring adjuvant combined therapy of apatinib and SHR-1210 (anti-PD-1), in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma at high risk of recurrence after radical resection
Presenter: Shida Yan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
347P - Relationship between modified surgical margin and prognosis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Yukiko Teramoto
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
348P - Malignant melanoma: A study of clinical profiles and treatment outcomes in Indian patients
Presenter: Sorun Shishak
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
349P - Flavonoids from ethanol extracts of euphorbia hirta inhibit melanoma growth and metastatic potential
Presenter: Shubhra Mishra
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
350P - Low-dose cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil combined concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Analysis of 23 cases
Presenter: Azusa Hiura
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
353P - A prediction model for the intents regarding life-sustaining treatment decisions in patients with terminal cancer
Presenter: Yoonsun Kim
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
354P - Predictive factors and survival outcomes with stereotactic body radiation therapy in treatment of oligometastases in colorectal cancer
Presenter: Vibhay Pareek
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
355P - Cost analysis and overview of single versus multiple fraction palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastasis
Presenter: Vinodhkumar Selvaraj
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
356P - Observational study on role of crude cannabis in pain control and quality of life in terminally ill cancer patients: An Indian perspective
Presenter: Vidyasagar Dusi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
357P - Application of multi-modal approach to palliation in end of life head and neck cancer pain
Presenter: Srujana Joga
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract