Abstract 396P
Background
Despite the many cervical cancer prevention interventions recommended and supported by WHO and partners of low- and middle-income countries; the burden of cancer is high in Uganda and the East African region. Little is known about factors associated with participating in screening at a primary health facility (PHF) and referral to a high-level facility.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted from February to March 2018 at Uganda Cancer Institute (UCI) among women visiting for cervical cancer screening. A structured questionnaire was used. Women suspected for cervical cancer and provided consent were enrolled and administered the questionnaire. Ethics review and approval was obtained from UCI research and ethics committee. A Stata version 14.1 software was used and Chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression analyses performed.
Results
Among 522 women enrolled, only 3.26% (17) had a formal referral note and 62.64% (327) had participated in cervical cancer screening before visiting UCI. There was a 17.65% false-positive rate among the referred women suspected with cervical cancer. 67.18% (131) among those who had never screened reported personal beliefs as a factor deterring their participation. Most women were aged between 35-44 years old (ORs=2.45, 95% CI = 1.61-3.72) who were divorced/widowed (ORs=1.89, 95% CI = 1.07-3.34) and drinking alcohol (ORs=0.51, 95% CI = 0.31-0.83). Among the referred women, 17.65% delayed to honour a referral request for more than a month because of socio-economic challenges. Factors such as high education level (ORs=0.11, 95% CI = 0.02-0.48) and confirmatory tests (ORs=6.10, 95% CI = 1.93-19.31) done at UCI were associated with referrals.
Conclusions
The present study identified factors associated with participation in screening at a PHF and referral to a high-level facility, which provides better understanding of lost follow-up after screening. Awareness in high risk groups, increase of screening facilities and integration of screening services with existing health programs is necessary.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Uganda Cancer Institute-African Development Bank capacity building fund.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
195P - HGCSG1601: A retrospective cohort study of the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P+GEM) for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC)
Presenter: Aya Tanimoto
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
196P - The tolerability and efficacy of FOLFIRINOX in gastro-oesophageal carcinoma
Presenter: Nicholas Travers
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
197TiP - GLOW: Zolbetuximab + CAPOX compared with placebo + CAPOX as first-line treatment for patients with Claudin18.2+/HER2– Locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma: A randomized phase III study
Presenter: Rui-Hua Xu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
198TiP - SPOTLIGHT: Comparison of zolbetuximab or placebo + mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment in patients with claudin18.2+/HER2– locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJ): A randomized phase III study
Presenter: Kensei Yamaguchi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
199TiP - Phase III (COSMIC-312) study of cabozantinib (C) in combination with atezolizumab (A) vs sorafenib (S) in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) who have not received previous systemic anticancer therapy
Presenter: Thomas Yau
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
200P - Apalutamide (APA) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC): Analysis of pain and fatigue in the TITAN study
Presenter: Byung Ha Chung
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
201P - Efficacy and safety of darolutamide in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in the ARAMIS trial
Presenter: Jacob See-tong Pang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
202P - What is the best first-line therapy for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer in 2019? A network meta-analysis
Presenter: Tsz Him So
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
203P - Long term outcomes of 2-weekly docetaxel in metastatic high-volume hormone sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Suhas Singla
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
204P - The effect of radium-223 therapy in agent orange related veterans with metastatic castrate resistance prostate carcinoma (CRPC)
Presenter: Andrew Liman
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract