Abstract 15P
Background
Although electrocautery is popularly used for the skin flap preparations at the time of mastectomy, we have been making the skin flap using the tumescent technique for the protects of the wound and skin flap since 2012 in our department. The aim of the study is to examine the differences of the clinical outcomes by between the surgeons (specialist who is familiar with breast surgery vs non-special surgeons).
Methods
166 patients who underwent the reconstruction after 1ststage of mastectomy with the tumescent technique at our hospital from March 2012 to December 2018 were enrolled. Tumescent technique; just before skin incision, we injected the tumescent solusions (200ml of physiological saline, 1mg of adrenaline, 20ml of xylocaine) subcutaneously into the breast and we started the sharp skin incision containing the tumor and around the areola like the spindle shape. If the tumor is close to the skin, we resected the skin just above tumor. We separated between subcutaneous and mammary tissue, and made the skin flap widely using the mechenbaum scissor and the wound retractor for protect the skin cutting edge. The most important things of this technique are to get the viewing field using the wound retractor with light and and the hemostasis exactly using McCannd forceps.
Results
patients characteristics is mean age 47.9 years (25-73 years), BMI is mean 21.1 (16.4-35.4), complication disease are 4 cases of hypertension, 4 cases of diabetes mellitus, 3 cases of radiotherapy previously, we performed surgery for 52 cases of DICS, for 114 cases of the invasive cancer including 10 cases of the axillary lymph node dissections, specialist performed 100 cases of mastectomy, on the other hand non-special surgeons performed 66 cases of mastectomy. Mean operation time is 56 min and 62 min (p = 0.314), there are no significant differences between the weight of the resected tissue and operation time (p = 0.062. Mean blood loss is 54ml each. 49 case (29%) of the mild necrosis of the skin, and 8 cases (4.7%) of hematoma were totally occurred after surgery, There are also no significant differences between specialist and non-special surgeons.
Conclusions
Mastectomy using the tumescent technique is easy and safe for not only specialist but also non-special surgeons.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Tissue expander and Inplants were approved for clinical use in Japan in July 2013.Since 2013, the reconstruction after mastectomy has been increasing year by year in Japan.
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
28P - Accuracy of core biopsy in predicting pathologic complete response in the breast in patients with complete/near complete clinical and radiological response (Complete Responders in the Breast – CRBr): A feasibility study
Presenter: Nisha Hariharan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
29P - Tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: Routine pathologic markers improve the predictive power of a cell-loss metric based on release of thymidine kinase 1 into blood
Presenter: Bernhard Tribukait
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
30P - Comparison of metabolic changes between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with ER positive, HER2 negative breast cancer
Presenter: Ho-hyun Ryu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
31P - Circulating miR-155 as a potential therapeutic monitoring marker in breast cancer
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
32P - Profile of breast cancer epidemiology in Sanglah General Hospital, Denpasar, Bali from 2012 to 2019
Presenter: Citra Aryanti
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
33P - Contrast enhanced chest CT in patients with breast cancer: Comprehensive imaging analysis and correlation with biological markers
Presenter: Bo Hwa Choi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
34P - Verification of metabolic regulatory mechanisms in androgen receptor-positive triple negative breast cancer
Presenter: Yuka Asano
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
35TiP - Ribociclib plus goserelin with hormonal therapy versus physician choice chemotherapy in pre-/perimenopausal patients with HR+, HER2– inoperable locally advanced breast cancer (ABC): RIGHT choice study
Presenter: Yen-Shen Lu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
36TiP - A prospective study to assess response to neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer at a regional cancer centre in South India
Presenter: Shina Goyal
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
41P - Clinical verification on the relationship between serum lipid metabolism and the immune microenvironment in breast cancer patients
Presenter: Wataru Goto
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract