Abstract 325P
Background
More patients are receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aim to explore whether an association exists between the presence of irAE and the efficacy of ICI in advanced HCC.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective review of patients with advanced HCC who received ICIs between May 2015 - Nov 2018 at our centre. IrAE were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. Response to ICI was evaluated based on RECIST v1.1 criteria.
Results
Of the 114 patients studied, median age was 67.3yrs (23.5-84.9) and 78 (89.7%) were male. 68.4% experienced irAE of any grade (n = 78), with 21.8% being grade 3-4 (n = 17). None were grade 5. Patients in the any-irAE group had comparable ORR and significantly higher DCR than the no-irAE group (23.4 vs 10.0%, p = 0.118 and 64.9 vs 30.0%, p = 0.001). Median PFS and OS in the any-irAE group were significantly longer than the no-irAE group (4.0 vs 1.4mths, p < 0.001 and 16.4 vs 3.3mths, p < 0.001, respectively). Comparing against the no-irAE group, the G1/2-irAE and G3/4-irAE groups had significantly longer median PFS (G1/2 (3.7mths) vs no irAE (1.4mths), p < 0.001; G3/4 (11.6mths) vs. no irAE (1.4mths), p = 0.001) and OS (G1/2 (14.5mths) vs no irAE (3.3mths), p < 0.001; G3/4 (20.9mths) vs. no irAE (3.3mths), p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of irAE was associated with longer median PFS [HR: 0.52 (95% CI 0.31-0.90), p = 0.018] and OS [HR: 0.38 (95% CI 0.20-0.71), p = 0.003]. Table:
325P Cox regression analysis of the association between irAE and survival outcomes
Univariate hazard ratio (95% CI) | p-value | Multivariate hazard ratio* (95% CI) | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PFS | ||||
Any | 0.37 (0.23-0.59) | <0.001 | 0.52 (0.31-0.90) | 0.018 |
Hepatobiliary irAE | 0.75 (0.44-1.26) | 0.28 | ||
Skin irAE | 0.29 (0.18-0.46) | <0.001 | 0.32 (0.20-0.52) | <0.001 |
Gastrointestinal irAE | 0.76 (0.45-1.27) | 0.29 | ||
Endocrine irAE | 0.27 (0.08-0.91) | 0.035 | 0.34 (0.10-1.18) | 0.091 |
Lung irAE | 0.24 (0.06-0.97) | 0.046 | 0.29 (0.07-1.20) | 0.087 |
OS | ||||
Any | 0.27 (0.16-0.47) | <0.001 | 0.38 (0.20-0.71) | 0.003 |
Hepatobiliary irAE | 0.56 (0.28-1.12) | 0.10 | ||
Skin irAE | 0.28 (0.16-0.49) | <0.001 | 0.35 (0.19-0.64) | 0.001 |
Gastrointestinal irAE | 0.58 (0.29-1.15) | 0.12 | ||
Endocrine irAE | 0.36 (0.11-1.24) | 0.11 | ||
Lung irAE | 0.38 (0.09-1.61) | 0.19 |
Significant covariables in univariate analysis were included; for PFS: age category, bilirubin category; for OS: age category, albumin category, bilirubin category.
Conclusions
The presence of irAE in advanced HCC patients treated with ICI could possibly predict better response and survival outcomes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
S.P. Choo: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Sirtex Medical; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lily; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen. D. Tai: Research grant / Funding (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck Sharp & Dohme; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Research grant / Funding (self): Sirtex. J. Lee: Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Research grant / Funding (self): Bayer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
27P - The prognostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and 18F-FDG PET SUV in breast cancer patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Presenter: Soong June Bae
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
28P - Accuracy of core biopsy in predicting pathologic complete response in the breast in patients with complete/near complete clinical and radiological response (Complete Responders in the Breast – CRBr): A feasibility study
Presenter: Nisha Hariharan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
29P - Tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: Routine pathologic markers improve the predictive power of a cell-loss metric based on release of thymidine kinase 1 into blood
Presenter: Bernhard Tribukait
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
30P - Comparison of metabolic changes between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with ER positive, HER2 negative breast cancer
Presenter: Ho-hyun Ryu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
31P - Circulating miR-155 as a potential therapeutic monitoring marker in breast cancer
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
32P - Profile of breast cancer epidemiology in Sanglah General Hospital, Denpasar, Bali from 2012 to 2019
Presenter: Citra Aryanti
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
33P - Contrast enhanced chest CT in patients with breast cancer: Comprehensive imaging analysis and correlation with biological markers
Presenter: Bo Hwa Choi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
34P - Verification of metabolic regulatory mechanisms in androgen receptor-positive triple negative breast cancer
Presenter: Yuka Asano
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
35TiP - Ribociclib plus goserelin with hormonal therapy versus physician choice chemotherapy in pre-/perimenopausal patients with HR+, HER2– inoperable locally advanced breast cancer (ABC): RIGHT choice study
Presenter: Yen-Shen Lu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
36TiP - A prospective study to assess response to neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer at a regional cancer centre in South India
Presenter: Shina Goyal
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract