Abstract 95P
Background
The type of liver resection (anatomical resection, AR or nonanatomical resection, NAR) for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is subject to debate. The debate may persist because some certain prognostic implications, associated with worse biological behavior of tumors, have been overlooked. The aim of this study was to explore the characteristics of patients who would benefit more from the performance of AR.
Methods
475 patients who underwent hepatic resection of CRLM were included and stratified by KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutational status. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied in relapse-free survival (RFS), and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent predictors of prognosis in multivariable analysis.
Results
Among all 475 patients, 154 (32.4%) underwent AR and 321 (67.6%) underwent NAR. 1-, 2-, and 3-year RFS for the entire cohort were 63.0%, 40.6%, and 31.2% respectively. In the cohort of patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutated tumors, patients who underwent AR had a markedly improved median RFS compared with patients who underwent NAR (24.1 VS. 12.9 months, P = 0.005). Upon the multivariable analyses, the performance of AR (hazard ratios=0.562; 95% CI 0.370-0.854, P = 0.007) remained prognostic independently for a superior RFS. In contrast, in the cohort of patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF wild-type tumors, patients who underwent AR had a comparable median RFS compared with those who underwent NAR (24.9 VS. 20.3 months, P = 0.901).
Conclusions
Patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutated tumors may benefit more from the performance of AR than from the performance of NAR.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Zhongshan Hospital.
Funding
The National Natural Science Foundation of China.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
358P - Evaluation of continuous low dose versus standard dose capecitabine monotherapy as second/third-line chemotherapy for metastatic malignancies
Presenter: Swaroop Revannasiddaiah
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
359P - Factors associated with economic burden among cancer patients with minor children: A cross-sectional web-based survey of an online cancer community
Presenter: Midori Yuki
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
360P - Factors influencing treatment decisions among breast cancer patients in the Philippine general hospital cancer institute: Medical oncology outpatient clinic
Presenter: Bobby De Guzman
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
361P - The role of volunteers in quality palliative care delivery
Presenter: NABANITA MANDAL
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
362P - Survey to assess the efficacy of continuity of care delivered through an out of hours telephonic consultation liaison
Presenter: Rahul D. Arora
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
366P - Activity of larotrectinib in TRK fusion cancer patients with primary central nervous system tumours
Presenter: David Ziegler
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
367P - Molecular characteristics and efficacy of crizotinib among different subsets of MET Amplification detected by next-generation sequencing in lung cancer
Presenter: Jing Li
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
368P - Genomic analysis of malaysian breast cancers unravel molecular differences from Caucasian breast cancers
Presenter: Soo-Hwang Teo
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
369P - Institutional-based prospective molecular profiling of advanced solid tumours in Hong Kong: A report of 253 cases
Presenter: Herbert Loong
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
370P - Tumour mutation burden analysis in a 5660-cancer-patient cohort reveals cancer type-specific mechanisms for high mutation burden
Presenter: Yuan-Sheng Zang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract