Abstract 95P
Background
The type of liver resection (anatomical resection, AR or nonanatomical resection, NAR) for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is subject to debate. The debate may persist because some certain prognostic implications, associated with worse biological behavior of tumors, have been overlooked. The aim of this study was to explore the characteristics of patients who would benefit more from the performance of AR.
Methods
475 patients who underwent hepatic resection of CRLM were included and stratified by KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutational status. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied in relapse-free survival (RFS), and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent predictors of prognosis in multivariable analysis.
Results
Among all 475 patients, 154 (32.4%) underwent AR and 321 (67.6%) underwent NAR. 1-, 2-, and 3-year RFS for the entire cohort were 63.0%, 40.6%, and 31.2% respectively. In the cohort of patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutated tumors, patients who underwent AR had a markedly improved median RFS compared with patients who underwent NAR (24.1 VS. 12.9 months, P = 0.005). Upon the multivariable analyses, the performance of AR (hazard ratios=0.562; 95% CI 0.370-0.854, P = 0.007) remained prognostic independently for a superior RFS. In contrast, in the cohort of patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF wild-type tumors, patients who underwent AR had a comparable median RFS compared with those who underwent NAR (24.9 VS. 20.3 months, P = 0.901).
Conclusions
Patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutated tumors may benefit more from the performance of AR than from the performance of NAR.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Zhongshan Hospital.
Funding
The National Natural Science Foundation of China.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
304P - Survival outcomes and survival predictors in recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer (R/M-HNSCC) patients treated with chemotherapy (CT) plus cetuximab as first-line therapy in a real-world study
Presenter: Filipa Pontes
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
305P - A retrospective study to evaluate patient characteristics for recurrent head and neck cancer after definitive treatment
Presenter: Tetsuro Wakasugi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
306P - Efficacy and safety of apatinib in heavily pretreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the head and neck
Presenter: Lin Gui
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
307P - Lacrimal gland tumours: Clinical and epidemiological patterns in the United States
Presenter: Mahmoud KhalafAllah
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
308P - Dental prophylaxis and 5-fluorouracil related oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients: A population-based cohort study
Presenter: Yi-Fang Huang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
309P - Evaluation of a pharmacist-led opioid de-escalation (PLODE) program after chemoradiotherapy completion in head and neck cancer patients
Presenter: Ai Horinouchi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
310P - Laser and PDT for the oral leukoplakia
Presenter: Sadykov Rasul
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
311P - Incidence of thyroid carcinoma in the Philippines: A retrospective study from a tertiary university hospital
Presenter: Priscilla Caguioa
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
312P - Oral health disparities among privileged and underprivileged tribes of south India - A study on precancerous oral lesions prevalence
Presenter: Shanavas Palliyal
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
313P - Immunotherapy application for advanced cancers: One institution experiences since 2016 to 2019
Presenter: Jo Pai Chen
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract