Abstract 91P
Background
To estimate the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II and III colon adenocarcinoma, we use a propensity score-matched (PSM), nationwide, population-based cohort study to estimate different adjuvant treatments in high-risk stage II or stage III colon adenocarcinoma.
Methods
We minimized the confounding effects with PSM of sex, age, pathologic stages, tumor locations, total cycles of chemotherapy, and Charlson comorbidity index in various adjuvant treatments outcomes in patients with high-risk stage II and III resctable colon adenocarcinoma from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database by dividing them as follows: group 1, those undergoing surgery alone; group 2, those undergoing adjuvant fluoropyrimidine alone; group 3, those receiving adjuvant oxaliplatin, fluoropyrimidine, and leucovorin (FOLFOX) and group 4 those receiving adjuvant folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan (FOFIRIL).
Results
In both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, adjusted HRs (aHRs) derived for mortality and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), reported as aHR (95% CI), derived for surgery alone, adjuvant fluoropyrimidine alone, and adjuvant FOLFIRI groups compared with the adjuvant FOLFOX group were 1.55 (1.32-1.82), 1.22 (1.05-1.43), and 2.97 (2.43-3.63), respectively. After stratified subgroup analysis, at high-risk stage II, the aHR (95% CI) derived for mortality was 0.52 (0.30-0.89) for the adjuvant fluoropyrimidine alone group compared with the group 3.
Conclusions
Adjuvant fluoropyrimidine alone were more suitable for patients with high-risk stage II colon adenocarcinoma rather than other adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. Adjuvant FOLFOX could be the optimal regimen for patients with pathologic stage III colon adenocarcinoma whatever elderly, sex, or tumor locations.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
41P - Clinical verification on the relationship between serum lipid metabolism and the immune microenvironment in breast cancer patients
Presenter: Wataru Goto
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
42P - Genome wide copy number analysis of circulating tumour cells in breast cancer liver metastasis
Presenter: Saber Imani
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
43P - A hotspot variants p.H1047R and p.H1047L in p110α/ΔNp63α complex affects structure, function and contributes to susceptibility metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Zou Linglin
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
44P - Correlation of circulating tumour cells with PET-CT in metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Venkata Pradeep Babu Koyyala
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
45P - The challenge of evaluating new targeted therapies: Opportunities in stratifying the therapeutic response per tumour location
Presenter: Hubert Beaumont
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
46P - Plasma soluble CD36 of breast cancer based on pathological and clinical characteristics
Presenter: Aditia Romadhoni
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
47P - Investigation of the use of a novel S-1 administration method for treating metastatic and recurrent breast cancer
Presenter: MAYUKO MIKI
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
48P - Development of MDA-MB-231-3D-Spheroid as a reliable model for studying Nav1.5 and nNav1.5-mediated breast cancer metastasis
Presenter: Ahmad Murtadha
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
49P - Biochemical study on modifying role of variants of leptin gene and its receptor on serum leptin levels in breast cancer
Presenter: Alshimaa Alhanafy
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
50P - Prognostic factors of recurrence or distant metastasis in elderly breast cancer patients
Presenter: Seungju Lee
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract