Abstract 168P
Background
It is important to predict prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer receiving chemotherapy. Several studies have reported that Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), which was based on serum albumin (Alb) and C-reactive protein (CRP), was associated with poor prognosis in many cancers. However, it is unclear whether GPS has prognostic value when patients receive Irinotecan, which is a key drug of advanced gastric cancer.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective multicenter study and investigated association between efficacy and GPS in patients who received irinotecan monotherapy between January 2010 and December 2017. All patients had to receive fluoropyrimidine and platinum as prior therapy. GPS was identified that GPS 0 was CRP ≤1.0 mg/dL and Alb ≥3.5 g/dL, GPS 1 was CRP >1.0 mg/dL or Alb <3.5 g/dL, and GPS 2 was CRP >1.0 mg/dL and Alb <3.5 g/dL.
Results
There were 174 patients at 8 centers included in this study. The number of patients with GPS 0/1/2 was 76/56/42, respectively. In GPS 0/1/2 patients, performance status (0-1/2≤), treatment line 2nd/3rd or later, and HER2 status were significantly different among them(p < 0.01). As for safety, there was no significant difference among GPS 0/1/2 patients. In GPS 0/1/2 patients, median PFS were 3.7/2.8/2.0 months (p < 0.01), median OS were 11.9/7.2/6.7 months (p < 0.01), respectively. In multivariate analysis, GPS was associated with shorter PFS (GPS 0 vs 1/0vs 2 : HR 1.180/2.378, 95%C.I. 0.793-1.758/1.405-4.024, p = 0.414/0.001), and shorter OS (GPS 0 vs 1/0vs 2 : HR 1.520/2.529, 95%C.I. 1.002-2.305/1.518-4.213, p = 0.049/<0.001).
Conclusions
In this analysis, GPS might be a predictive and prognostic factor in treatment with irinotecan monotherapy for patients with AGC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Yoshito Komatsu.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
206P - Population-based validation of the risk stratification among prostate cancer patients
Presenter: Mu Xie
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
211P - Adjuvant axitinib in Asian vs non-Asian patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): ATLAS trial subgroup analysis
Presenter: Chi Fai Ng
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
212P - Immunotherapy with nivolumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients in India: Bringing a change in clinical practice
Presenter: Amit Rauthan
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
213P - An observational retrospective real-world study of sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) patients in an Asian cancer centre
Presenter: Ravindran Kanesvaran
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
214P - Targeting epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), novel strategy to delay resistance or re-sensitize renal cancer to Sunitinib
Presenter: Revati Sharma
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
215P - Radiologic and pathologic tumour size variation in localized renal cell carcinoma and its implications
Presenter: Shanky Singh
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
216P - Partial versus radical nephrectomy: 10- year long-term survival among patients with Wilms tumour
Presenter: Mira Mostafa
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
217P - Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a useful biomarker for predicting worse clinical outcome in chemo-resistant urothelial carcinoma patients treated with pembrolizumab
Presenter: Koichiro Ogihara
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
219P - Long-term outcomes of bladder preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients
Presenter: Amanda Dania Satiti
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
220P - An outcome analysis of robotassisted radical nephroureterectomy with extended template lymphadenectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Presenter: Ashwin Tamhankar
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract