Abstract 353P
Background
Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision systems have been in effect since February 2018 in South Korea. These systems ensure that medically insignificant life-sustaining treatments, which are undesired by the patient, are avoided. This study was designed to develop and verify an explanatory model of terminal cancer patients’ intent related to decisions regarding discontinuing or not performing meaningless, life-sustaining treatments in South Korea.
Methods
Data were collected from April 15 to July 10 2019, via a survey using self-reported questionnaires. A total of 220 patients, with terminal cancer, were recruited. The hypothetical model was constructed using four exogenous variables—family function, knowledge on life-sustaining treatment decisions, likelihood of the treatment outcome, and treatment burden—and three endogenous variables—attitudes towards, the efficacy of, and intent regarding life-sustaining treatment decisions.
Results
The goodness-of-fit of this hypothetical model was x2=169.25, χ2/df=1.90, RMSEA=.07, RMR=0.02, GFI=.91, AGFI=.90, NFI=.97, CFI=.98, RMSEA=.06 The results demonstrated that knowledge on, attitudes towards, the efficacy of life-sustaining treatment decisions, and treatment burden all had significant and direct effects on participants’ intent regarding their treatment decisions. Family function was indirectly associated with participants’ intent regarding life-sustaining treatment decisions. These variables explained 88.8% of the total variance with respect to the intent regarding life-sustaining treatment decisions, with knowledge on these decisions being the most influential factor.
Conclusions
The results of this study suggest that, in order to improve terminal cancer patients’ intent regarding life-sustaining treatment decisions related to discontinuing or not performing meaningless life-sustaining treatments, nursing interventions should focus on enhancing their knowledge around this topic, as well as the efficacy of these choices. In particular, a patient’s family function is a crucial intervention strategy that can enhance their intent regarding life-sustaining treatment decisions.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
195P - HGCSG1601: A retrospective cohort study of the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P+GEM) for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC)
Presenter: Aya Tanimoto
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
196P - The tolerability and efficacy of FOLFIRINOX in gastro-oesophageal carcinoma
Presenter: Nicholas Travers
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
197TiP - GLOW: Zolbetuximab + CAPOX compared with placebo + CAPOX as first-line treatment for patients with Claudin18.2+/HER2– Locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma: A randomized phase III study
Presenter: Rui-Hua Xu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
198TiP - SPOTLIGHT: Comparison of zolbetuximab or placebo + mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment in patients with claudin18.2+/HER2– locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJ): A randomized phase III study
Presenter: Kensei Yamaguchi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
199TiP - Phase III (COSMIC-312) study of cabozantinib (C) in combination with atezolizumab (A) vs sorafenib (S) in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) who have not received previous systemic anticancer therapy
Presenter: Thomas Yau
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
200P - Apalutamide (APA) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC): Analysis of pain and fatigue in the TITAN study
Presenter: Byung Ha Chung
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
201P - Efficacy and safety of darolutamide in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in the ARAMIS trial
Presenter: Jacob See-tong Pang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
202P - What is the best first-line therapy for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer in 2019? A network meta-analysis
Presenter: Tsz Him So
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
203P - Long term outcomes of 2-weekly docetaxel in metastatic high-volume hormone sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Suhas Singla
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
204P - The effect of radium-223 therapy in agent orange related veterans with metastatic castrate resistance prostate carcinoma (CRPC)
Presenter: Andrew Liman
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract