Abstract 441P
Background
Both Western and Chinese medicine, despite different in methods and systems, are well accepted in Hong Kong. According to a survey on cancer patients in Hong Kong conducted by the Hong Kong Baptist University in 2009, 57% of cancer patients used at least one form of Chinese Medicine therapy. Among those who were on chemotherapy, 60% of them are concurrently receiving Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) herbal therapy. This pilot study addressed the problem of hepatotoxicity of concurrent Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) herbal therapy use, which is the major hurdle of integrated Chinese-Western medicine practice in cancer medicine. We evaluated the difference in incidence of liver toxicity of cancer patients receiving systemic therapy with or without concurrent TCM herbal therapy.
Methods
187 patients were prospectively recruited in the Department of Clinical Oncology of Queen Mary Hospital. Through questionnaires and the online Clinical Management System (CMS), they were followed up for 3 months, their current Western systemic therapy, TCM herbal therapy taken, and liver function tests results (bilirubin, ALT, AST, ALP) were retrieved. Patients were divided into the TCM herbal therapy and non-TCM herbal therapy group, depending on whether TCM herbal therapy was taken concurrently with systemic therapy. Liver function derangement was graded by CTCAE v4.0. The differences between the TCM herbal therapy and non-TCM herbal therapy groups were analysed by Pearson’s chi square test and Mann-Whitney U tests. Multivariable analysis was performed by Cox proportional hazard models to identify the prognostic factors for TCM herbal therapy coverage.
Results
There was no significant difference of liver toxicity incidence between the TCM herbal therapy and non-TCM herbal therapy group(P = 0.577). No prognostic factors (age and sex) were identified for TCM herbal therapy coverage.
Conclusions
The results of our pilot study suggest that concurrent TCM herbal therapy usage by cancer patients does not increase the risk of liver toxicity. Our results warrant further prospective studies to confirm the finding.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
195P - HGCSG1601: A retrospective cohort study of the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P+GEM) for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC)
Presenter: Aya Tanimoto
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
196P - The tolerability and efficacy of FOLFIRINOX in gastro-oesophageal carcinoma
Presenter: Nicholas Travers
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
197TiP - GLOW: Zolbetuximab + CAPOX compared with placebo + CAPOX as first-line treatment for patients with Claudin18.2+/HER2– Locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma: A randomized phase III study
Presenter: Rui-Hua Xu
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
198TiP - SPOTLIGHT: Comparison of zolbetuximab or placebo + mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment in patients with claudin18.2+/HER2– locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJ): A randomized phase III study
Presenter: Kensei Yamaguchi
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
199TiP - Phase III (COSMIC-312) study of cabozantinib (C) in combination with atezolizumab (A) vs sorafenib (S) in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) who have not received previous systemic anticancer therapy
Presenter: Thomas Yau
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
200P - Apalutamide (APA) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC): Analysis of pain and fatigue in the TITAN study
Presenter: Byung Ha Chung
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
201P - Efficacy and safety of darolutamide in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in the ARAMIS trial
Presenter: Jacob See-tong Pang
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
202P - What is the best first-line therapy for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer in 2019? A network meta-analysis
Presenter: Tsz Him So
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
203P - Long term outcomes of 2-weekly docetaxel in metastatic high-volume hormone sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Suhas Singla
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract
204P - The effect of radium-223 therapy in agent orange related veterans with metastatic castrate resistance prostate carcinoma (CRPC)
Presenter: Andrew Liman
Session: Poster display session
Resources:
Abstract