Abstract 4359
Background
The prognostic role of Progesterone receptor (PR) expression in early invasive breast cancer (BC) remains controversial. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to investigate the impact of PR expression levels on outcome of patients with luminal-like Her2 negative early BC.
Methods
A population cohort of 441 primary invasive ER+/Her2- early BC patients from a single cancer center underwent surgery and received adjuvant endocrine therapy from 2000 to 2017 was retrieved. To assess the impact of the different PR levels on the prognosis, we calculated the Distant Free Survival (DFS) and the Breast Cancer Specific Survival (BCSS) according to 4 subtypes established on the basis of Ki67 value and PR expression rate (Subtype 1: PR ≥ 20%/Ki67<20%; Subtype 2: PR ≥ 20%/Ki67≥20%; Subtype 3: PR < 20%/Ki67≥20%; Subtype 4: PR < 20%/Ki67<20%). Cox regression analysis was used to correlate tumor characteristics with DFS and BCSS.
Results
The rates of progression disease were 8%, 19%, 30% and 12% in subtype 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Low PR expression (<20%) resulted an independent poor prognostic factor for DFS in patients with high Ki67 value (≥20%). The median DFS was 12.6 months and 10.1 months in subtype 2 and subtype 3, respectively (p = 0.025) (Fig.1). The rates of cancer death were 5%, 12%, 24% and 12 % in subtype 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Consistent with DFS results, a statistically significant correlation of PR expression level and BCSS was reported in patients with high Ki67 index (the median BCSS was 12.9 months in subtype 2 versus 10.5 months in subtype 3, respectively) (p = 0.04). No correlations between survival and PR expression were demonstrated in patients with low Ki67 value (<20%), probably due to the small sample size in the subtypes 1 and 4 groups.
Conclusions
Our study revealed different outcomes among patients with early BC according to different PR expression levels. Noteworthy, in patients with Ki67 ≥20%, low PR expression levels (<20%) could be considered as a prognostic marker suggesting to re-evaluate PR status as a potential therapeutic guide in ER+/Her2- early BC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
A. Diana: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen, Novartis, Pharmamar, Italfarmaco. F. Carlino: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Italfarmaco, Gentili. E. Franzese: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche. S. Centonze: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Thesaro, Roche, Gentili. F. De Vita: Advisory / Consultancy: Roche, Amgen, Celgene, Lilly. F. Ciardiello: Advisory / Consultancy: Merck, Roche, Lilly, Bayer, Amgen, Pfizer, Servier. M. Orditura: Honoraria (self): Epionpharma, Italfarmaco; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): EISAI. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4413 - Infigratinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 gene fusions/translocations: the PROOF trial
Presenter: Ghassan Abou-Alfa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4710 - Phase 3 (COSMIC-312) study of cabozantinib (C) in combination with atezolizumab (A) vs sorafenib (S) in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) who have not received previous systemic anticancer therapy
Presenter: Lorenza Rimassa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5509 - A Randomized Controlled, Open label, Adaptive Phase-3 Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of EndoTAG-1 Plus Gemcitabine versus Gemcitabine alone in Patients with Measurable Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas Failed on FOLFIRINOX Treatment (NCT03126435)
Presenter: Li-Tzong Chen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1463 - Modified FOLFOX versus modified FOLFOX plus nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction – Moonlight, a randomized phase 2 trial of the German Gastric Group of the AIO.
Presenter: Sylvie Lorenzen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2392 - GLOW: Randomized Phase 3 Study of Zolbetuximab + CAPOX Compared With Placebo + CAPOX as First-line Treatment of Patients With CLD18.2⁺/HER2⁻ Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Manish Shah
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5217 - PRODIGE67_UCGI33 ARION: Association of Radiochemotherapy and Immunotherapy for the treatment of unresectable Oesophageal caNcer: a comparative randomized phase II trial
Presenter: Rosine Guimbaud
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1726 - Randomized phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel + ramucirumab versus weekly nab-paclitaxel + ramucirumab for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination refractory to first-line therapy: WJOG10617G/P-SELECT
Presenter: Kenro Hirata
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2279 - FRONTiER: A Feasibility Trial of Nivolumab With Neoadjuvant CF or DCF Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma
Presenter: Shun Yamamoto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4912 - A phase Ib/II study of AK104, a PD-1/CTLA-4 Bispecific Antibody, Combined With mXELOX as First-line Therapy for Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Jiafu Ji
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3780 - Perioperative atezolizumab in combination with FLOT versus FLOT alone in patients with resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: DANTE, a randomized, open-label phase II trial of the German Gastric Group of the AIO and the SAKK.
Presenter: Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract