Abstract 2698
Background
Triple negative breast cancers are a heterogeneous group of breast cancer candidate to adjuvant chemotherapy in a large majority of cases. However, literature data indicate that the diagnosis of special types of breast cancer might be associated with a different outcome if compared with invasive ductal carcinoma with similar biological features and stages. Selected triple negative apocrine breast cancer can have an extremely good prognosis.
Methods
Among the 210 women with first primary invasive apocrine non metastatic breast cancer operated between January 1998 and December 2016 at European Institute Oncology, Milan, we identified 24 patients with pT1-pT2, node-negative, triple negative subtype and Ki-67 ≤20% who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. We compared the outcome of this cohort with a similar group of 48 patients with ductal tumors who received adjuvant chemotherapy, matched by pathological stage and biological features (matching ratio 1:2).
Results
The median age was 63 and 50 years in the apocrine and ductal group, respectively. The mean value of Ki-67 expression was 12% in the apocrine group and 14% in the ductal group. 83% of apocrine tumors had size less than 2 cm, compared with 71% of ductal tumors. After a median follow-up of 6.6 years no patients in the apocrine group experienced a breast cancer related event compared with 12 events (including 5 loco-regional recurrences, 3 distant recurrences e 4 contralateral tumors) in the ductal carcinoma group (Gray test p-value=0.015).
Conclusions
The outcome of selected apocrine triple negative breast cancer patients is excellent and possibly deserves a treatment de-escalation. Multicenter projects focusing on the possibility to avoid adjuvant chemotherapy in selected subtypes of triple negative breast cancers with favorable outcome are warranted.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
G. Cancello: Honoraria (self): Pierre Fabre. E. Montagna: Honoraria (self): Pierre fabre; Honoraria (self): gentili. E. Munzone: Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy: Genomic Health. S. Dellapasqua: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche. M.A. Colleoni: Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: OBI Pharma; Advisory / Consultancy: Puma Biotechnology; Advisory / Consultancy: Celldex; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4413 - Infigratinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 gene fusions/translocations: the PROOF trial
Presenter: Ghassan Abou-Alfa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4710 - Phase 3 (COSMIC-312) study of cabozantinib (C) in combination with atezolizumab (A) vs sorafenib (S) in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) who have not received previous systemic anticancer therapy
Presenter: Lorenza Rimassa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5509 - A Randomized Controlled, Open label, Adaptive Phase-3 Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of EndoTAG-1 Plus Gemcitabine versus Gemcitabine alone in Patients with Measurable Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas Failed on FOLFIRINOX Treatment (NCT03126435)
Presenter: Li-Tzong Chen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1463 - Modified FOLFOX versus modified FOLFOX plus nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction – Moonlight, a randomized phase 2 trial of the German Gastric Group of the AIO.
Presenter: Sylvie Lorenzen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2392 - GLOW: Randomized Phase 3 Study of Zolbetuximab + CAPOX Compared With Placebo + CAPOX as First-line Treatment of Patients With CLD18.2⁺/HER2⁻ Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Manish Shah
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5217 - PRODIGE67_UCGI33 ARION: Association of Radiochemotherapy and Immunotherapy for the treatment of unresectable Oesophageal caNcer: a comparative randomized phase II trial
Presenter: Rosine Guimbaud
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1726 - Randomized phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel + ramucirumab versus weekly nab-paclitaxel + ramucirumab for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination refractory to first-line therapy: WJOG10617G/P-SELECT
Presenter: Kenro Hirata
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2279 - FRONTiER: A Feasibility Trial of Nivolumab With Neoadjuvant CF or DCF Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma
Presenter: Shun Yamamoto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4912 - A phase Ib/II study of AK104, a PD-1/CTLA-4 Bispecific Antibody, Combined With mXELOX as First-line Therapy for Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Jiafu Ji
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3780 - Perioperative atezolizumab in combination with FLOT versus FLOT alone in patients with resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: DANTE, a randomized, open-label phase II trial of the German Gastric Group of the AIO and the SAKK.
Presenter: Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract