Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session 1

2949 - EGFR-mediated PD-L1 upregulation in HER2+ breast cancer (BC) cell line models

Date

28 Sep 2019

Session

Poster Display session 1

Presenters

Nicola Gaynor

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_5): v1-v24. 10.1093/annonc/mdz238

Authors

N. Gaynor1, M. Mc Dermott2, A. Canonici1, J. Crown3, D.M. Collins1

Author affiliations

  • 1 National Institute For Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, D09NR58 - Dublin/IE
  • 2 David Geffen School Of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095 - Los Angeles/US
  • 3 Medical Oncology, St Vincents University Hospital, D04 T6F4 - Dublin/IE
More

Resources

Abstract 2949

Background

The tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) lapatinib (L), a reversible dual EGFR/HER2 inhibitor, and afatinib (A), an irreversible pan-HER inhibitor, are approved for the treatment of HER2+ BC and EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), respectively. Anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors are showing clinical activity in HER2+ BC and NSCLC. Pre-clinical studies in EGFR-mutant NSCLC models suggest that there may be a link between EGFR activity and PD-L1 expression. This study investigates the potential of the EGF signalling pathway to alter PD-L1 expression in parental and L- or A-resistant HER2+ BC cell lines to examine the pre-clinical rationale for the combination of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents and TKIs in HER2+ BC.

Methods

Parental (HCC1954-P, SKBR3-P) and TKI-resistant HER2+ breast cancer cell lines (L-resistant HCC1954-L, A-resistant SKBR3-A) were treated with the EGFR ligand EGF (10ng/ml) alone, L (1µM) alone or the combination of EGF and L for 24 hours. Protein lysates were generated. PD-L1 (CST E1L3N), EGFR (ThermoFisher MS665) and pEGFR y1068 (Millipore 07818) expression levels were assessed by Western blot. Densitometry analysis was carried out on triplicate data using Total Lab Quant. A Student’s t test p value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

All cell lines examined showed a significant increase in PD-L1 expression upon EGF treatment (HCC1954-P – 3-fold increase (p = 0.02), HCC1954-L - 2.5 fold increase (p = 0.03), SKBR3-P - 4.4 fold increase (p = 0.03), SKBR3-A - 1.9 fold increase (p = 0.01)). L was capable of blocking EGF-mediated PD-L1 upregulation in the HCC1954-P, SKBR3-P an SKBR3-A cell lines (p = 0.04, p = 0.04 and p = 0.01 respectively). L was not capable of blocking EGF-mediated PD-L1 upregulation in the HC1954-L cell line. For parental and resistant cell line models, pEGFR levels corresponded to PD-L1 expression upon EGF and L treatment.

Conclusions

The results indicate PD-L1 expression can be altered by manipulation of EGFR activity in HER2+ breast cancer cell line models. The development of targeted therapy resistance can interfere with the ability of EGFR to impact PD-L1 levels. Further examination of EGFR and PD-L1 is warranted in HER2+ breast cancer models.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Cancer Clinical Research Trust.

Disclosure

A. Canonici: Research grant/Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim. J. Crown: Full/Part-time employment: OncoMark; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Eisai; Honoraria (self): Amgen; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Puma Biotechnology; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Seattle Genetics; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Vertex; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Genomic Health; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche; Honoraria (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: MSD Oncology; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: AstraZeneca; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Abbvie. D.M. Collins: Research grant/Funding (self): Puma Biotechnology; Research grant/Funding (self): Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings