Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Cocktail & Poster Display session

25P - Feasibility of digital spatial profiling as a diagnostic: Comparison to immunohistochemistry (IHC)

Date

16 Oct 2024

Session

Cocktail & Poster Display session

Presenters

Hannah Hibbs

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_6): 1-20. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop103740

Authors

H. Hibbs1, J. Gerrard2, S. Hoffmann2, M. Scott2, M. Vandenberghe2, D. Duncan2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Astrazeneca, CB20SL - Cambridge/GB
  • 2 Astrazeneca, Cambridge/GB

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 25P

Background

Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP) is an alternative method to IHC for quantitative assessment of multiple proteins on a single tissue section; with spatial context of all markers in relation to each other. DSP offers the potential for patient treatment decisions not relying on manual interpretation, with the added value of preserving tissue.

Methods

This proof-of-concept study investigated DSP as an alternative method to the assessment of PD-L1 (22C3), HER2 (4B5) and cMET (SP44) IHC. The dynamic range of each biomarker was assessed using the GeoMx© DSP protein assay and quantified on the nCounter© platform. 34 commercial Non Small Cell Lung Cancer cases were assessed using IHC and DSP. For DSP, up to 20 650μm2 regions of interest (ROIs) were placed across each tissue to sample the whole tumor; same slide pan-cytokeratin immunofluorescent staining was used as a guide to identify cells of epithelial origin. Median digital counts (Log2 normalised to endogenous protein GAPDH) were compared to the % of tumor cells stained with each IHC assay as assessed by a board-certified pathologist.

Results

Median DSP counts demonstrated a non-linear, positive correlation to the % of tumor cells stained with PD-L1, HER2 and cMET (R2 = 0.452, 0.434,0.402). The table shows average counts in IHC defined groups. Coefficient of variation was used to assess intra case heterogeneity across ROIs and ranged from 0.32-2.1 for PDL1, 0.2-1.9 for HER2 and 0.17 to 1.1 for cMET. Table: 25P

Biomarker IHC threshold Average DSP count # Cases
HER2 (4B5) 0 38.05 20
1+ 89.32 7
2+ 143.97 7
3+ N/A 0
PD-L1 (22C3) Tumor proportion score (TPS) < 1% 6.2 16
TPS 1–49% 12.16 6
TPS ≥ 50% 53.27 11
cMET (SP44) 3+ Tumor Cell (TC) < 50% 309.25 19
3+ TC ≥ 50% 818.64 5

Conclusions

Biomarker heterogeneity and thresholds of protein expression are important for determining patient response. DSP potentially overcomes challenges associated with determining tumor heterogeneity. This study successfully used the GeoMx© technology to demonstrate spatial heterogeneity and correlation against IHC; showing spatial variance may have value beyond the single IHC score in predicting patient response. Further investigation and validation of DSP technologies in a clinical setting is warranted.

Editorial acknowledgement

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

AstraZeneca PLC.

Funding

AstraZeneca.

Disclosure

H. Hibbs, J. Gerrard, S. Hoffmann, M. Scott, D. Duncan: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca. M. Vandenberghe: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: AstraZeneca.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.