Abstract 96P
Background
Determination of MMR functioning in EC is recommended by international guidelines. Its deficiency leads to MSI with intermediate prognosis. Available data have shown a reasonable concordance between IHC-MMR and NGS-MSI. We aim at evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of NGS-MSI obtained from a comprehensive cancer genome profiling (CGP) assay compared with the gold standard IHC-MMR.
Methods
Selected EC patients were profiled using TruSight Oncology500 High Throughput solution. MSI status was determined by 130 noncoding homopolymer regions and at least 40 sites were assessed to provide a score (threshold MSI high>20). IHC-MMR evaluation was collected from standard pathology report.
Results
From March 2022 to May 2023, 404 EC were enrolled. NGS-MSI evaluation was available for 354 (87%; see table). Cohort characteristics are reported in the table. Sensitivity and specificity of NGS-MSI testing compared to IHC-MMR were 99% (n=223/224) and 52% (n= 68/130) respectively, with a concordance rate of 82% (Cohen Kappa = 0.58; p < .0001). The positive predictive value of NGS-MSI was 78% (n=223/285), while the negative predictive value was 99% (n= 68/69). Among the 62 misclassified cases, 19 were MSH6 + MSH2 deficient, 42 MLH1 + PMS2 deficient and 1 was deficient for PMS2, MLH1 and MSH6. 38 MLH1 + PMS2 deficient patients were addressed to MLH1 promoter methylation analysis: results are available for 15 cases (11 hypermethylated, 2 partially hypermethylated). All 19 MSH6 + MSH2 deficient were addressed to genetic counselling: results are available only for 3 patient (1 displaying a MSH2 pathogenic variant). Table: 96P
Characteristics | Cohort (N = 354) | ||
Histotype, n (%) | |||
Endometrioid | 307 (87%) | ||
Serous carcinoma | 18 (5%) | ||
Others | 29 (8%) | ||
FIGO Stage 2019*, n (%) | |||
I-II | 149 (93%) | ||
III-IV | 25 (7%) | ||
MSI status, n (%) | |||
MSI | 69 (19%) | ||
MSS | 285 (81%) | ||
MMR IHC status, n (%) | |||
pMMR | 224 (63%) | ||
dMMR | 130 (37%) |
Conclusions
A moderate concordance between IHC-MMR and NGS-MSI was reported in our study. However, given the approval of immunotherapy in several settings it is important to further characterize the misclassified cases.
Editorial acknowledgement
Clinical trial identification
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
C. Nero: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Other: Illumina. D. Lorusso: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Clovis, GSK, MSD, AZ, PharmaMar.G. Scambia: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD, Clovis, Tesaro, J&J. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
146P - The prognosis value of heat-shock proteins in esophagogastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Eric Nakamura
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
148P - Identification of potential predictive biomarkers for ovarian cancer chemotherapy response
Presenter: Alsina Nurgalieva
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
149P - Rare RAS mutations are associated with recurrence patterns and recurrence-free survival in colon cancer: First results from Morocco
Presenter: Fatima Agy
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
151P - Development of a predictive model for response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy of rectal cancer using the immunologic profile
Presenter: Eun Shin
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
152P - Biomarkers of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy response in locally advanced rectal cancer
Presenter: Cibele Masotti
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
153P - BRAF variants and therapy outcomes in melanoma
Presenter: Eftychia Chatziioannou
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
154P - The impact of proton pump inhibitors in the prognosis of patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Presenter: João Barbosa Martins
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
155P - Use of machine learning for the identification of molecular biomarkers to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer patients
Presenter: María Del Río Pisula
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
156P - Molecularly driven therapy recommended by a molecular tumor board: Accessible option or privilege for a minority of patients? A single-center experience from the Czech Republic
Presenter: Michal Eid
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
157P - PCM4EU academy: An educational program for precision oncology
Presenter: Loic Verlingue
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract