Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session

56P - The prognostic role of KRAS mutations in patients with early stage lung adenocarcinoma after robotic lobectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy

Date

15 Oct 2022

Session

Poster display session

Presenters

Filippo Tommaso Gallina

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 33 (suppl_8): S1383-S1430. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1095

Authors

F.T. Gallina1, D. Marinelli2, D. Forcella1, R. Tajè1, S. Ceddia3, F. Fusco4, E. Melis1, S. Buglioni3, P. Visca3, F. Cappuzzo3, F. Facciolo1

Author affiliations

  • 1 IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute (IRE), Rome/IT
  • 2 Sapienza - Università di Roma, Rome/IT
  • 3 IRCCS Istiuto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena (IRE), Rome/IT
  • 4 IRCCS Istiuto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena (IRE), 186 - Rome/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 56P

Background

KRAS in one of the most frequently altered oncogenes in NSCLC. The prognostic role of the KRAS mutations in early-stage NSCLC is still unclear. In this study we aim to analyze the overall survival (OS) and the disease free survival (DFS) of patients with early stage NSCLC underwent lobectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy.

Methods

Patients who underwent lobectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy for clinical stage I-II lung adenocarcinoma and next-generation sequencing (NGS) were evaluated. Exclusion criteria were the neoadjuvant treatment, an incomplete resection and the presence of EGFR mutations. Mutations were classified as KRASwild-type, KRASG12C, or KRASother.

Results

A total of 257 patients were included in the study (Table). The KRAS mutation status was: 161 KRASwild type, 42 KRASg12c and 54 KRASother. All the patients reported a resection of at least 4 nodal stations and the median of resected lymph nodes was 16 (11-36). After pathological examination 200 patients confirmed the N0, 30 patients was N1 and the remainder N2. Adjuvant therapy was administered to 25 patients (9.7%). The KRASg12c group showed a non-significant worst 3-year OS compared to KRASother group (p=0.2). OS was not statistically significant different between patients with any mutation and patient with KRASwild type. However, the 3-year DFS of the KRASg12c group was substantially worse compared to the KRASother group (62.5% vs 74.3%; p=0.04). Table: 56P

Kras wild type (161) Kras g12c (42) Kras other (54)
Age (years) 68 (44-78) 66 (50-77) 67 (49-80)
Sex (m/f) 94/67 33/9 28/26
Smoking history (y/n) 104/57 38/4 49/5
Pack/years 24 (15-68) 29 (12-80) 23 (14-78)
Side (right/left) 99/62 30/12 34/20
pN0 122 33 33
pN1 16 7 11
pN2 23 2 10
Resected N stations 6 (4-7) 5 (4-8) 6 (4-7)
Resected lymph nodes 17 (12-33) 19 (13-36) 15 (11-31)
Metastatic lymph nodes 2 (1-3) 3 (1-4) 2 (1-4)
PD-L1 (%) 29 (0-90%) 43 (0-70) 37 (0-80)
Adjuvant treatment 17 3 5

Conclusions

Our results showed that in a homogeneous cohort of stage I-III lung adenocarcinoma after radical surgery, the group of KRASg12c mutation had a worst DFS compared to the KRASwild type and KRASother. without differences in terms of OS.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.