Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

159P - Efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and survival surrogate analysis of neoadjuvant treatment in IB-IIIB lung squamous cell carcinoma

Date

22 Mar 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Topics

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Jia Liu

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_3): 1-12. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop102573

Authors

J.C. Liu, X.H. Huang, C. Gu, Y.Q. Wang, P.H. Xia, X.Y. Lve, J. Hu

Author affiliations

  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical School of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 159P

Background

Until now, there are still few comparisons between neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with stage IB-IIIB lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). In addition, the ability of pathologic response to predict long-term survival has still not been established.

Methods

In this retrospective, controlled clinical trial, we ultimately enrolled 231 patients with stage IB to IIIB LUSC who received 2-4 cycles perioperative immunochemotherapy or chemotherapy alone, followed by resection. The primary endpoint of this study was pathological response. Secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), surgical resection rate and adverse events (AEs).

Results

The rates of major pathologic response (MPR) and pathologic complete response (pCR) in the immunochemotherapy group were 66.7% and 41.9%, respectively, which were both higher than that in the other group (MPR: 25.0%, pCR: 20.8%) (P<0.001). The median DFS in the chemotherapy group was 33.1 months (95% CI, 8.4 to 57.8) and not reached in the immunochemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.543; 95% CI, 0.303 to 0.974; P=0.038). The median OS of the immunochemotherapy group was not achieved (HR for death, 0.747; 95% CI, 0.373 to 1.495; P=0.41), with the chemotherapy group 64.8 months. The objective response rate (ORR) of immunochemotherapy regimen was higher than that of the chemotherapy regimen(immunochemotherapy: 74.5%, chemotherapy: 42.3%, P<0.001). MPR was significantly associated with DFS and OS (HR, 0.325; 95% CI, 0.127 to 0.833; P=0.019; and HR, 0. 906; 95% CI, 0.092 to 1.008; P=0.051, respectively). The C-index of MPR (0.730 for DFS, 0.722 for OS) was higher than the C-index of cPR (0.672 for DFS, 0.659 for OS) and clinical response (0.426 for DFS, 0.542 for OS). Therapeutic regimen (P<0.001; OR=7.406; 95% CI, 3.054 to 17.960) was significantly correlated with MPR.

Conclusions

In patients with stage IB to IIIB LUSC, neoadjuvant treatment with immunochemotherapy can produce a higher percentage of patients with a MPR and longer survival than chemotherapy alone. MPR may serve as a surrogate endpoint of survival to evaluate neoadjuvant therapy.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.